[2012] KEHC 5176 (KLR)
The court found that the Land Disputes Tribunal exceeded its statutory jurisdiction under Section 3(1) of the Land Disputes Tribunal Act by purporting to determine ownership of land and ordering its surrender, as well as directing payments. Such matters fall outside the tribunal's mandate, rendering its award a...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2012] KEHC 5176 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Sarah Dama; Respondent: Land Tribunal Dispute Malindi; Respondent: Principal Magistrate’s Court, Malindi; MISSING: Lilian Sidi; MISSING: John Charo Tosfwa
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Malindi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Civil Application 10 of 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Judicial Review (certiorari)
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Judges
- CW Meoli
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction of Land Disputes Tribunal, Judicial Review Certiorari, Land Ownership Disputes
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sarah Dama
Applicant
Land Tribunal Dispute Malindi
Respondent
Principal Magistrate’s Court, Malindi
Respondent
Lilian Sidi
MISSING
John Charo Tosfwa
MISSING
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Judicial Review (certiorari)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Land Disputes Tribunal had jurisdiction to determine ownership of unregistered land and order payments.
- 2 Whether the application for judicial review was filed within the statutory six-month period.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the Land Disputes Tribunal exceeded its statutory jurisdiction under Section 3(1) of the Land Disputes Tribunal Act by purporting to determine ownership of land and ordering its surrender, as well as directing payments. Such matters fall outside the tribunal's mandate, rendering its award a nullity. The court further held that the application for judicial review was filed within the statutory six-month period, and the objection on limitation was without merit. Consequently, the court issued an order of certiorari to quash both the tribunal's proceedings and award, and the subsequent judgment of the Principal Magistrate's Court adopting the award.
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- An order of certiorari is issued quashing the proceedings and award of the Malindi Land Disputes Tribunal dated 30th August 2010.
- The subsequent judgment of the Principal Magistrate's Court, Malindi, adopting the award is quashed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
24 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT
AT MALINDI
MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10 OF 2011 (JR)
SARAH DAMA....................................................................................................APPLICANT
VERSUS
LAND TRIBUNAL DISPUTE MALINDI..................................................1ST RESPONDENT
PRINCIPAL MAGISTRATE’S COURT, MALINDI..................................2ND RESPONDENT
A N D
LILIAN SIDI.....................................................................................1ST INTERESTED PARTY
JOHN CHARO TOSFWA................................................................2ND INTERESTED PARTY
RULING
The exparte applicant through her Notice of Motions dated 25th march 2011 and brought under Order 53 rule 3(1) of the Civil Procedure Rules seeks an order of certiorari to remove to this court for purposes of quashing, the proceeds and award of the Land Dispute Tribunal (Malindi) case No. 20 of 2010 and the decision of the Principal Magistrate in civil case 19 of 2011 adopting the same.
The subject matter is an unregistered piece of land situated at KWACHOCHA. The gist of the applicant’s affidavit supporting the application sit that the tribunal acted without jurisdiction by purporting to determine a claim of ownership of the suit land and directing certain payments to be made by the exparte applicant.
The interested parties have filed a replying affidavit in opposition to the application, supporting the decision of the tribunal as lawful, and further stating that the exparte applicant field the application outside of six months.
Having considered the rival affidavits, the submissions as well as the orders which are the subject of this matter, it is quite clear the decision of the Tribunal exceeded its mandate under Section 3(1) of the Land Disputes Tribunal Act.
The dispute before the tribunal related to the issue of ownership to a parcel of land which the tribunal purported to order surrendered to the 1st Interested Party, as well as requiring certain payments of the parties.
The applicant came to court within six (6) months of the decision of the tribunal albeit very close to the deadline. That objection does not hold.
The award of the Tribunal was a nullity for want of jurisdiction. The nullity could not be cured by way of appeal, as suggested by the Interested Parties.
An order of certiorari shall therefore issue to quash the proceedings and award of the Malindi Land Disputes Tribunal dated 30th August 2010, as well as the subsequent judgment of the Lower Court adopting the award.
Each party will bear its own costs.
Delivered and signed on this 21st day of February, 2012 at Malindi in the presence of:
C. W. Meoli
JUDGE