[2000] KECA 189 (KLR)
The court held that the delay in filing the Notice of Appeal was only one day and that the applicant acted promptly in seeking an extension. The technical objection regarding the sealing of annexures to the affidavit was deemed too technical to defeat the application, especially since the affidavit itself...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2000] KECA 189 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Sarah Hersi Ali; Respondent: Kenya Commercial Bank Ltd
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Court Station
- Court of Appeal at Kisumu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Application 165 of 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Notice and Record of Appeal
- Outcome
- Application allowed.
- Judges
- AM Akiwumi
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Appeal Procedure, Affidavit Requirements
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sarah Hersi Ali
Applicant
Kenya Commercial Bank Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Notice and Record of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant should be granted an extension of time to file a notice and record of appeal out of time.
- 2 Whether non-compliance with Rule 9 of the Oaths and Statutory Declaration Act regarding sealing of exhibits to affidavits is fatal to the application.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the delay in filing the Notice of Appeal was only one day and that the applicant acted promptly in seeking an extension. The technical objection regarding the sealing of annexures to the affidavit was deemed too technical to defeat the application, especially since the affidavit itself established the relevant facts and the respondent did not deny the allegations. The court exercised its discretion to allow the extension, emphasizing that procedural rules should not be applied so rigidly as to deny substantive justice.
Court Disposition
Application allowed.
Orders
- The applicant shall file her Notice of Appeal within the next 7 days.
- The applicant shall file the Record of Appeal within 30 days thereafter.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
26 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT KISUMU
(AKIWUMI, J.A (IN CHAMBERS)
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. NAI 165 OF 1999 (KSM.14/99)
BETWEEN
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT KISUMU
(AKIWUMI, J.A (IN CHAMBERS)
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. NAI 165 OF 1999 (KSM.14/99)
BETWEEN
SARAH HERSI ALI ................................................................ APPLICANT
AND
KENYA COMMERCIAL BANK LTD ........................................RESPONDENT
(An application for extension of time to file notice and record of appeal out of time in an intended appeal from the judgment of the High Court of Kenya at Bungoma dated 23rd June, 1997 (Justice C. Ongudi)
in
H.C.C.A. No.84 of 1996
*****************
RULING
It is not disputed that the applicant was only one day out of time in filing her Notice of Appeal and because of this purely technical ground, her appeal was struck out on 18. 6.99.
She expeditiously applied on 30. 6.99 for extension of time to file a Notice of Appeal. Her quick action has also not been critised. What has been the objection to her present application is rather that the affidavit in support of her application, had annexed to it annextures which contrary to the mandatory provisions of Rule 9 of the Rules made under S.6 of the Oaths and Statutory Declaration Act, provides that all exhibits to affidavits shall be securely sealed thereto under the seal of the "Commissioner" as opposed to the phrase "Commissioner for Oaths" which has been consistently employed through out the Act and the rules made thereunder. But this will be too technical a point to insist on. Apart from the fact that in my experience the provisions of Rule 9 have not been applied at all, the affidavit itself, without the annextures, establishes that the delay in filing the Notice of Appeal was only one day. Furthermore, these allegations have not been denied by any of the replying affidavits filed by the Respondent. Rules are handmaidens of this Court but we must be careful that handmaidens do not become harsh mistresses.
In my view, having regard to what I have herein before said, the peculiar surrounding circumstances of this case, the need not to deny the applicant his undoubted right of appeal, I would exercise my unfettered discretion and order that the Applicant files her Notice of Appeal within the next 7 days and the Record of Appeal within 30 days thereafter. There will be no order as to costs.
Dated and delivered at Kisumu this 20th day of March, 2000.
A.M. AKIWUMI
.................
JUDGE OF APPEAL
I certify that this is a true copy of the original.
DEPUTY REGISTRAR