Mwaniki v Nderitu & another (Civil Appeal E014 of 2025) [2026] KEHC 4986 (KLR) (17 April 2026) (Judgment)
The appellant was properly served with summons and notices, failed to take action for over five years without satisfactory explanation, and the draft defence did not raise triable issues; therefore, the trial court was justified in dismissing the application to set aside the default judgment.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2026] KEHC 4986 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Sarah Njeri Mwaniki; 1st Respondent: Charles Wanjohi Nderitu; 2nd Respondent: Mary Wairimu Kanyingi
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 17 April 2026
- Case Number
- Civil Appeal E014 of 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Default Judgment, Setting Aside Judgment, Service of Process, Appeals
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sarah Njeri Mwaniki
Appellant
Charles Wanjohi Nderitu
1st Respondent
Mary Wairimu Kanyingi
2nd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial court erred in dismissing the application to set aside ex parte judgment
- 2 Whether the default judgment was regularly or irregularly entered
- 3 Whether the appellant was properly served with summons
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant was properly served with summons and notices, failed to take action for over five years without satisfactory explanation, and the draft defence did not raise triable issues; therefore, the trial court was justified in dismissing the application to set aside the default judgment.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed in its entirety
- Costs to be met by the appellant
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment