[2020] KEELC 3215 (KLR)

[2020] KEELC 3215 (KLR)

The court found that the nature of the order sought, namely the delineation and marking of land boundaries by the County Surveyor and/or District Land Registrar, did not meet the threshold for certification as urgent. However, recognizing the importance of the matter and the applicant's right to enforce the judgment...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEELC 3215 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Sarah Thara; Defendant: Jamlick Kinyua Njoka
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Chuka
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 129 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Interlocutory Application Ruling
Outcome
Application not certified as urgent; directions given for service and interpartes hearing.
Legal Topics
Land Boundary Delineation, Registered Land, Execution of Judgment
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Land Boundary Delineation Registered Land Execution of Judgment

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sarah Thara

Plaintiff

Jamlick Kinyua Njoka

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Interlocutory Application Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the court should order the County Surveyor and/or District Land Registrar to delineate and mark the boundaries of the specified land parcels.
  2. 2 Whether the application should be certified as urgent.
  3. 3 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to enforcement of judgment regarding land boundaries.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the nature of the order sought, namely the delineation and marking of land boundaries by the County Surveyor and/or District Land Registrar, did not meet the threshold for certification as urgent. However, recognizing the importance of the matter and the applicant's right to enforce the judgment regarding her registered land parcels, the court directed that the application be served upon the defendant and scheduled for interpartes hearing on a priority basis. The court exercised its discretion to balance the need for expeditious resolution with procedural fairness to the respondent.

Court Disposition

Application not certified as urgent; directions given for service and interpartes hearing.

Orders

  • The applicant to serve this application upon the defendant within the next 10 days.
  • The application will be heard interpartes on 7th April, 2020 if courts will have resumed normal operations.