[2018] KEELC 1573 (KLR)
The court held that, in the absence of an agreement on costs upon withdrawal of an application by consent, the general rule that costs follow the event applies. Therefore, the applicant is entitled to costs of the withdrawn application, to be taxed by the taxing master.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEELC 1573 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Savuka Tours and Safaris Ltd; Defendant: Peter Gatere and 7 Others
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Narok
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 202 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Ruling / Costs Determination After Withdrawal by Consent
- Outcome
- Costs of the application awarded to the applicant to be taxed by the taxing master.
- Judges
- MN Kullow
- Legal Topics
- Costs Award, Withdrawal of Application
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Savuka Tours and Safaris Ltd
Plaintiff
Peter Gatere and 7 Others
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Ruling / Costs Determination After Withdrawal by Consent
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether costs should be awarded following the withdrawal of an application by consent where parties did not agree on costs.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that, in the absence of an agreement on costs upon withdrawal of an application by consent, the general rule that costs follow the event applies. Therefore, the applicant is entitled to costs of the withdrawn application, to be taxed by the taxing master.
Court Disposition
Costs of the application awarded to the applicant to be taxed by the taxing master.
Orders
- Costs of the application are awarded to the applicant to be taxed by the taxing master.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
18 paragraphs
REPUBIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT NAROK
ELC CAUSE NO. 202 OF 2017
FORMERLY NAKURU ELC NO. 68 OF 2013
SAVUKA TOURS AND SAFARIS LTD........................PLAINTIFF
-VERSUS-
PETER GATERE AND 7 OTHERS........................DEFENDANTS
RULING
This ruling is in respect of the award of cost arising from an application that the parties had agreed to withdraw by consent even though there was a consent on withdrawal there was no agreement as to who was to pay for costs.
It is trite law that costs ordinarily follow the event and I will thus award cost of the application to the Applicant to be taxed by the taxing master.
Orders accordingly.
DATED, SIGNED and DELIVERED in open court at NAROK on this 27th day of September, 2018
Mohammed Noor Kullow
Judge
27/9/18
In the presence of:-
N/A for parties and advocates
CA:Timothy/Kimiriny