[2018] KEELRC 1688 (KLR)
The court found that the subordinate court lacked jurisdiction to determine employment and labour relations matters after the promulgation of the 2010 Constitution and the establishment of the Employment and Labour Relations Court. Consequently, the judgement delivered by the subordinate court on 13th September,...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEELRC 1688 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Security Ward Services; Respondent: Peter Nyongesa Wandera
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause 23 of 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Cause Appeal / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution and Jurisdictional Review
- Outcome
- Judgement of the subordinate court voided for want of jurisdiction; suit transferred to the Employment and Labour Relations Court for fresh hearing.
- Judges
- DI Wasike
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction of Elrc, Transfer of Suits, Effect of 2010 Constitution
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Security Ward Services
Applicant
Peter Nyongesa Wandera
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Cause Appeal / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution and Jurisdictional Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the subordinate court had jurisdiction to hear and determine employment and labour relations matters after the promulgation of the 2010 Constitution and the establishment of the Employment and Labour Relations Court.
- 2 Whether the judgement delivered by the subordinate court on 13th September, 2016 is valid.
- 3 Whether the suit should be transferred to the Employment and Labour Relations Court for fresh hearing and disposal.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the subordinate court lacked jurisdiction to determine employment and labour relations matters after the promulgation of the 2010 Constitution and the establishment of the Employment and Labour Relations Court. Consequently, the judgement delivered by the subordinate court on 13th September, 2016 was void. The proper course was to transfer the suit to the Employment and Labour Relations Court for fresh hearing and disposal, as only this court has the requisite jurisdiction over such matters.
Court Disposition
Judgement of the subordinate court voided for want of jurisdiction; suit transferred to the Employment and Labour Relations Court for fresh hearing.
Orders
- The judgement of the subordinate court delivered on 13th September, 2016 is voided for want of jurisdiction.
- Civil Suit No 10839 of 2007 is transferred to the Employment and Labour Relations Court for fresh hearing and disposal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
21 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT OFKENYA
AT NAIROBI
CAUSE APPEAL NUMBER23 OF 2016
SECURITY WARD SERVICES...........................CLAIMANT
VERSUS
PETER NYONGESA WANDERA................RESPONDENT
RULING
1. By a Notice of Motion filed on 5th December, 2016 the applicant sought stay of execution pending appeal against the judgement of the subordinate court Hon. L. M. Wachira delivered on 13th September, 2016.
2. The court will not consider the application but will instead void the judgement of the subordinate court delivered on 13th September, 2016 on the ground that the same was made without jurisdiction since the promulgation of the Constitution in 2010 and the inauguration of the ELR Court in 2012, employment and labour relations matters became a preserve of this Court.
3. This has seen several matters that were filed in the High Court and Subordinate Court transferred to this court for hearing and disposal. The appropriate order to make in the present circumstance is to order the transfer of Civil suit No 10839 of 2007 to this court for fresh hearing and disposal.
4. It is so ordered.
Dated at Nairobi this 23rd day of February, 2018
ABUODHA J. N.
JUDGE
Delivered this 23rd day of February, 2018
In the presence of:-
................................for the claimant
...........................for the Respondent
ABUODHA J. N.
JUDGE