Kathuri v Mutero & 2 others (Civil Suit 20 of 2018) [2026] KEHC 5118 (KLR) (16 April 2026) (Ruling)

Kathuri v Mutero & 2 others (Civil Suit 20 of 2018) [2026] KEHC 5118 (KLR) (16 April 2026) (Ruling)

The applicant Elsy Muthoni, as a registered owner of a subdivision of the suit property by order of the trial court, is entitled to be heard on the appeal. Delivery of judgment without her participation would violate her right to fair hearing. Judgment is therefore arrested and the appeal reopened for hearing with...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2026] KEHC 5118 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Selina Wanjiru Kathuri; Respondent: Tarsila Warigia Mutero; Substituted Respondent/personal Representative: Muriithi Munori; Applicant: Elsy Muthoni
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Suit 20 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Ruling on Application to Arrest Judgment
Outcome
judgment arrested; appeal reopened for hearing
Legal Topics
Arrest of Judgment, Right to Fair Hearing, Enforcement of Succession Orders, Joinder of Parties
Source Language
en
Succession Law Civil Procedure Arrest of Judgment Right to Fair Hearing Enforcement of Succession Orders Joinder of Parties

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Selina Wanjiru Kathuri

Appellant

Tarsila Warigia Mutero

Respondent

Muriithi Munori

Substituted Respondent/personal Representative

Elsy Muthoni

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Ruling on Application to Arrest Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the applicant Elsy Muthoni is entitled to be heard before delivery of judgment in the appeal
  2. 2 Whether the judgment set for 16th April, 2026 should be arrested to allow the applicant to participate
  3. 3 Whether the applicant is a lawful owner of a portion of the suit property by virtue of prior court orders

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant Elsy Muthoni, as a registered owner of a subdivision of the suit property by order of the trial court, is entitled to be heard on the appeal. Delivery of judgment without her participation would violate her right to fair hearing. Judgment is therefore arrested and the appeal reopened for hearing with notice to the applicant.

Court Disposition

judgment arrested; appeal reopened for hearing

Orders

  • Judgment set for 16th April, 2026 is arrested and stayed.
  • Appeal is reopened for hearing on a date to be fixed.