[2024] KEHC 7253 (KLR)

[2024] KEHC 7253 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant failed to comply with its directions to file and serve the application and did not attend court as required. There was no indication of interest in prosecuting the matter. In the absence of compliance and attendance, the court inferred abandonment of the proceedings by the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEHC 7253 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Senaca East Africa Limited; Respondent: Private Security Regulatory Authority; Respondent: Board of Private Security Regulatory Authority; Respondent: Fazul Mohammed; Respondent: Attorney General
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nakuru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Judicial Review Miscellaneous Application E002 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Abandonment
Outcome
matter marked as abandoned and file closed
Judges
PN Gichohi
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Abandonment of Proceedings, Case Management
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Judicial Review Abandonment of Proceedings Case Management

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Senaca East Africa Limited

Applicant

Private Security Regulatory Authority

Respondent

Board of Private Security Regulatory Authority

Respondent

Fazul Mohammed

Respondent

Attorney General

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Abandonment

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has prosecuted the matter as directed by the court.
  2. 2 Whether the matter should be marked as abandoned due to non-compliance and non-attendance.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant failed to comply with its directions to file and serve the application and did not attend court as required. There was no indication of interest in prosecuting the matter. In the absence of compliance and attendance, the court inferred abandonment of the proceedings by the applicant. Accordingly, the matter was marked as abandoned and the file closed under the provisions of section 1A and 1B of the Civil Procedure Act, which empower the court to facilitate the just, expeditious, proportionate, and affordable resolution of civil disputes and to manage cases actively.

Court Disposition

matter marked as abandoned and file closed

Orders

  • The matter is marked as abandoned.
  • The file is closed under section 1A and 1B of the Civil Procedure Act.