[2018] KEELRC 263 (KLR)

[2018] KEELRC 263 (KLR)

The court found that the claimant was serving under a fixed-term contract set to expire on 31st March 2014, but the respondent terminated the contract prematurely on 11th March 2014 without issuing the required 7-day notice or affording the claimant an opportunity to be heard. The respondent failed to adduce any...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELRC 263 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Senata Margaret; Respondent: Hot Point Appliances (K) Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 1126 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
Claim allowed in part for unfair termination and payment in lieu of notice.
Judges
HS Wasilwa
Legal Topics
Unfair Termination, Fixed Term Contracts, Notice Periods, Compensation for Termination
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Unfair Termination Fixed Term Contracts Notice Periods Compensation for Termination

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Senata Margaret

Claimant

Hot Point Appliances (K) Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the claimant's employment was terminated unfairly and without due process.
  2. 2 Whether the claimant is entitled to compensation for unfair termination and payment in lieu of notice.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the claimant was serving under a fixed-term contract set to expire on 31st March 2014, but the respondent terminated the contract prematurely on 11th March 2014 without issuing the required 7-day notice or affording the claimant an opportunity to be heard. The respondent failed to adduce any evidence to controvert the claimant's assertions. The court held that while the respondent was under no obligation to renew the contract, the premature termination without notice or due process rendered the dismissal unfair. Consequently, the claimant was entitled to compensation for unfair termination equivalent to three months' salary and payment in lieu of notice equivalent to...

Court Disposition

Claim allowed in part for unfair termination and payment in lieu of notice.

Orders

  • Respondent to pay claimant three months' salary as compensation for unfair termination (Kshs. 61,074).
  • Respondent to pay claimant seven days' salary in lieu of notice (Kshs. 4,750.20).