[2023] KETAT 989 (KLR)

[2023] KETAT 989 (KLR)

The Tribunal found that the Applicant had demonstrated sufficient grounds to warrant interference with the enforcement process, given the absence of a proven tax liability and the Respondent's failure to respond or provide evidence justifying the caveat. The Tribunal confirmed that an appeal was properly lodged and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KETAT 989 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Senco Limited; Respondent: Commissioner Of Domestic Taxes
Court
Tax Appeal Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Tax Appeal E138 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Tax Appeal / Ruling on Interlocutory Application
Outcome
application allowed with conditions
Judges
E.N Wafula, M Makau, EN Njeru, E Ng'ang'a, AK Kiprotich
Legal Topics
Tax Recovery Measures, Caveats on Property, Appeal Rights, Interlocutory Injunctions
Source Language
en
Tax Law Civil Procedure Tax Recovery Measures Caveats on Property Appeal Rights Interlocutory Injunctions

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Senco Limited

Applicant

Commissioner Of Domestic Taxes

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Tax Appeal / Ruling on Interlocutory Application

  1. 1 Whether the caveat placed by the Respondent on the Applicant's property should be lifted pending the hearing and determination of the tax appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the Respondent was justified in placing a caveat on the Applicant's property in the absence of a proven tax liability.
  3. 3 Whether the Tribunal has jurisdiction to grant interim relief restraining enforcement actions by the Respondent.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the Applicant had demonstrated sufficient grounds to warrant interference with the enforcement process, given the absence of a proven tax liability and the Respondent's failure to respond or provide evidence justifying the caveat. The Tribunal confirmed that an appeal was properly lodged and pending, thus invoking its jurisdiction to grant interim relief under Section 18 of the Tax Appeals Tribunal Act and Section 42(14) of the Tax Procedures Act. However, to balance the interests of both parties, the Tribunal ordered the lifting of the caveat on the Applicant's property on condition that the Applicant is restrained from disposing of the property pending the final...

Court Disposition

application allowed with conditions

Orders

  • The caveat placed by the Respondent on L.R No.209/3324 is lifted, vacated, and/or removed on condition that the Applicant is restrained from disposing of the property pending the hearing and final disposal of the appeal.
  • The Respondent is restrained from placing any caveat or issuing agency notices relating to the tax assessment subject of the dispute pending the hearing and determination of the appeal.