[2020] KECA 331 (KLR)
The Court found that the applicant had satisfied the twin principles for the grant of stay of execution and injunction pending appeal under Rule 5(2)(b) of the Court of Appeal Rules. The applicant demonstrated an arguable appeal and showed that, absent the orders sought, the intended appeal would be rendered...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] KECA 331 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Sentrim Kenya Limited; Respondent: Kenya Hotels and Allied Workers Union; Respondent: KUDHEIHA Workers
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Court Station
- Court of Appeal at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Appeal (Application) 118 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application for Injunction and Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- Application allowed; injunction and stay of execution granted pending appeal, subject to deposit of decretal sum.
- Judges
- RN Nambuye, DK Musinga, F Sichale
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Injunction Pending Appeal, Arguable Appeal, Nugatory Appeal, Decretal Amount, Court of Appeal Rules
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sentrim Kenya Limited
Applicant
Kenya Hotels and Allied Workers Union
Respondent
KUDHEIHA Workers
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Injunction and Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has demonstrated an arguable appeal warranting the grant of an injunction and stay of execution pending appeal.
- 2 Whether the intended appeal would be rendered nugatory if the orders sought are not granted.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that the applicant had satisfied the twin principles for the grant of stay of execution and injunction pending appeal under Rule 5(2)(b) of the Court of Appeal Rules. The applicant demonstrated an arguable appeal and showed that, absent the orders sought, the intended appeal would be rendered nugatory due to the risk of attachment and disposal of its property. The lack of opposition from the respondents further supported the applicant's case. The Court therefore granted the orders of injunction and stay of execution, conditional upon the applicant depositing the decretal sum in court within 14 days.
Court Disposition
Application allowed; injunction and stay of execution granted pending appeal, subject to deposit of decretal sum.
Orders
- An injunction restraining the 1st respondent, its agents and/or servants from attaching, proclaiming, selling or otherwise interfering with the applicant’s equipment, tools and property pending the hearing and determination of the intended appeal is granted.
- Stay of execution of the judgment and/or decree in Nairobi ELRC No.2145 of 2014 pending the hearing and determination of the intended appeal is granted.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
37 paragraphs
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL
AT NAIROBI
(CORAM: NAMBUYE, MUSINGA & SICHALE, JJ.A.)
CIVIL APPEAL (APPLICATION) NO. 118 OF 2018
BETWEEN
SENTRIM KENYA LIMITED.......................................APPLICANT
AND
KENYA HOTELS AND
ALLIED WORKERS UNION.............................1STRESPONDENT
KUDHEIHA WORKERS....................................2NDRESPONDENT
(Being an application for Injunction and Stay of Execution pending the hearing and determination of an Appeal from the Ruling and Orders of the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi (Hellen Wasilwa, J.) dated 27th January 2016
in
E.L.R.C Cause No. 2145 of 2014. )
**************************
RULING OF THE COURT
1. UPONperusing the Notice of Motion dated 18th April 2019 by the applicant seeking an order of injunction to restrain the 1st respondent by itself, agents and/or servants from attaching, proclaiming, selling, leasing or in any way disposing of the equipment and tools of the applicant pending the hearing and determination of an appeal; an order staying execution of the proclamation dated 29th November 2019 pending the hearing and determination of an appeal; stay of execution of the judgment and/or decree of the Court in Nairobi ELRC No. 2145 of 2014 pending the hearing and determination of an appeal, among other prayers; and
2. UPONreading the affidavit ofRajni Shah, the Managing Director of the applicant sworn on 18th April 2019 in support of the application; and
3. UPONnoting that there is no replying affidavit filed by the respondent; and
4. HAVINGconsidered the principles that guide this Court in determining applications under rule 5(2)(b) of this Court’s Rules as summarized in Stanley Kangethe v Tony Ketter & Others [2013] eKLR, we appreciate that the applicant has demonstrated that it has an arguable appeal; and that unless the orders sought are granted the applicant’s intended appeal may be rendered nugatory.
5. HAVINGreached that conclusion, we make the following orders:
(i) We grant an order of injunction to restrain the 1st respondent, its agents and/or servants from attaching, proclaiming, selling or in any other way interfering with the applicant’s equipment, tools and property pending the hearing and determination of an intended appeal.
(ii) We grant stay of execution of the judgment and/or decree in Nairobi ELRC No.2145 of 2014 pending the hearing and determination of an intended appeal.
(iii) The applicant shall within 14 days from the date hereof, deposit in this Court a sum of Kshs.786,600 being the decretal amount ordered by this Court to be deposited in a joint interest earning account on 14th February 2018 because the 1st respondent’s conduct has frustrated the opening of the joint bank account.
(iv) The costs of this application shall abide the outcome of the intended appeal.
Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 2ndof October, 2020.
R. N. NAMBUYE
……………..………..
JUDGE OF APPEAL
D. K. MUSINGA
……………………..
JUDGE OF APPEAL
F. SICHALE
……………..………..
JUDGE OF APPEAL
I certify that this is a true copy of the original
Signed
DEPUTY REGISTRAR