[2016] KEELC 634 (KLR)
The court found that the Memorandum of Appeal was filed one day late, contrary to the thirty-day requirement under Section 79G of the Civil Procedure Act. However, considering the minimal delay and the potential for confusion regarding the number of days in the month, the court exercised its discretion to extend...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2016] KEELC 634 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Serah Wanjiru Migwi; Appellant: Kenya Kairi Farmers Co. Ltd; Respondent: Njoki Njenga
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Nakuru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Appeal 134 of 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application to Strike Out Memorandum of Appeal for Late Filing
- Outcome
- Application to strike out the Memorandum of Appeal dismissed; time for filing extended subject to payment of throw away costs.
- Judges
- MA Silau
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Appeals From Subordinate Courts, Filing Deadlines, Exercise of Judicial Discretion
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Serah Wanjiru Migwi
Appellant
Kenya Kairi Farmers Co. Ltd
Appellant
Njoki Njenga
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application to Strike Out Memorandum of Appeal for Late Filing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Memorandum of Appeal was filed out of time contrary to Section 79G of the Civil Procedure Act.
- 2 Whether the court should exercise its discretion to extend time and deem the appeal as properly filed despite the delay.
- 3 Whether costs should be awarded to the respondent for the application.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the Memorandum of Appeal was filed one day late, contrary to the thirty-day requirement under Section 79G of the Civil Procedure Act. However, considering the minimal delay and the potential for confusion regarding the number of days in the month, the court exercised its discretion to extend time and deemed the appeal as properly filed. This extension was granted in the interest of justice and subject to the payment of throw away costs to the respondent. The court emphasized that the respondent was justified in bringing the application and awarded costs accordingly.
Court Disposition
Application to strike out the Memorandum of Appeal dismissed; time for filing extended subject to payment of throw away costs.
Orders
- Time for filing the Memorandum of Appeal is extended and the appeal is deemed properly filed.
- Appellants to pay throw away costs of Kshs. 10,000 to the respondent within 30 days.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
35 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT OF KENYA
AT NAKURU
HCA 134 OF 2013
SERAH WANJIRU MIGWI …….….…….……1ST APPELLANT
KENYA KAIRI FARMERS CO. LTD…………2ND APPELLANT
VERSUS
NJOKI NJENGA …….……………….......……..RESPONDENT
RULING
(Application to strike out Memorandum of Appeal as having been filed late; same filed one day late; court in exercise of its discretion allows the appeal but subject to payment of throw away costs).
1. The application before me is that dated 13 April 2015 filed by the respondent. It seeks the following orders:-
(i) That the Memorandum of Appeal dated 16 August 2013 be struck out on ground of being filed out of thirty (30) days time limit as required by Section 79G of the Civil Procedure Act.
(ii) That costs of this application be provided for.
2. I have perused the record. It shows that on 16 August 2013, the subject Memorandum of Appeal was filed. The appeal is from the judgment of Hon. J. N. Mwaniki, Senior Principal Magistrate, Nakuru, and is in respect of Nakuru CMCC No. 2126 of 2005. In that case, the appellants had been sued by the respondent herein, over certain land. Judgment was entered on 16 July 2013, in favour of the plaintiff in the case (respondent herein) hence the appeal.
3. There is no contest that an appeal from the Magistrate's Court needs to be filed within 30 days of the decision. This is brought out in Section 79G of the Civil Procedure Act, which provides as follows :-
79G. Time for filing appeals from subordinate courts
Every appeal from a subordinate court to the High Court shall be filed within a period of thirty days from the date of the decree or order appealed against, excluding from such period any time which the lower court may certify as having been requisite for the preparation and delivery to the appellant of a copy of the decree or order:
Provided that an appeal may be admitted out of time if the appellant satisfies the court that he had good and sufficient cause for not filing the appeal in time.
4. Counsel for the applicant has argued that Section 79G is couched in mandatory terms. He submitted that the appeal was filed out of time without the leave of the court and should be dismissed. He relied on the cases of Postal Corporation of Kenya vs Job Gachenge Njagi (2004) eKLR ; Godfrey Kariuki Gathingi vs Gladys Njeri Kirongo & 2 Others (2015) eKLR ; Sammy K. Kirui vs Remmy K. Korir (2015) eKLR;and MG & Another (Children Appealing through FWM) vs JKG (2015) eKLR.
5. The respondents have opposed the application through the Affidavit of Sarah Wanjiru Migwi the 1st appellant. She has explained that she did not know that her former firm of advocates, M/s Karanja Mbugua & Company Advocates, had actually filed this appeal and she had on her part filed in person an application dated 20 June 2014 in Nakuru HCCC Misc. Application No. 130 of 2014, for leave to appeal out of time. She has deposed that she is of the view that the appeal was filed within time, and if not, she has asked the court to exercise its discretion to extend time and deem the appeal as properly filed.
6. I have considered the matter. I am not in doubt that the Memorandum of Appeal was filed one day late. Judgment was delivered on 16 July 2012, and given that the month of July has 31 days, then the appeal needed to be filed on 15 August 2012 at the latest. The Memorandum of Appeal in our case was filed on 16 August 2012.
7. However, considering the totality of circumstances, it being easy to confuse the months that have 30 days with those which have 31 days, and the fact that it is only one day late, in my discretion, and in order to do justice to the parties, I will extend time so that the Memorandum of Appeal is deemed to have been filed within time, but this will be subject to payment of costs. I do so in exercise of my discretion given the surrounding circumstances.
8. The respondent cannot however be faulted for filing this application and I will award him costs of the same. I will award throw away costs of Kshs. 10,000/= which must be paid within 30 days. In default, the Memorandum of Appeal will stand struck out.
9. It is so ordered.
Dated, signed and delivered in open court at Nakuru this 20th day of July, 2016
MUNYAO SILA
JUDGE
ENVIRONMENT & LAND COURT NAKURU
In the presence of:
Ms. Gitau holding brief for Mr. Karanja for applicant.
Ms. Ngere holding brief for Mrs. Magana for respondent.
Court Assistant: Janet.
MUNYAO SILA
JUDGE
ENVIRONMENT & LAND COURT NAKURU