[2019] KEHC 7383 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant had demonstrated a real apprehension that the 1st respondent was seeking to dispose of the suit property, L.R. No. Kathwana/1215, as evidenced by the presence of potential buyers and ongoing efforts to sell. The court held that, to preserve the subject matter of the petition and...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEHC 7383 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Seraphin Ndagara M’Mwamba; Respondent: David N. Kanampiu; Respondent: District Land Adjudication & Settlement Officer Meru South; Respondent: Director of Land Adjudication; Respondent: Land Registrar, Meru South; Respondent: Chief Land Registrar; Respondent: The Honourable Attorney General
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Chuka
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Constitutional Petition 3o f 20 of 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Constitutional Petition / Interlocutory Application (ruling on Interim Inhibition)
- Outcome
- Interim inhibition order granted; application not certified urgent; costs in the cause; inter partes hearing scheduled.
- Judges
- FM Njoroge
- Legal Topics
- Inhibition Orders, Land Registration, Protection of Property Rights, Interlocutory Injunctions
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Seraphin Ndagara M’Mwamba
Applicant
David N. Kanampiu
Respondent
District Land Adjudication & Settlement Officer Meru South
Respondent
Director of Land Adjudication
Respondent
Land Registrar, Meru South
Respondent
Chief Land Registrar
Respondent
The Honourable Attorney General
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Interlocutory Application (ruling on Interim Inhibition)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an interim order of inhibition should issue to restrain registration of dealings in L.R. No. Kathwana/1215 pending hearing.
- 2 Whether the applicant has demonstrated sufficient grounds for preservation of the suit property.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant had demonstrated a real apprehension that the 1st respondent was seeking to dispose of the suit property, L.R. No. Kathwana/1215, as evidenced by the presence of potential buyers and ongoing efforts to sell. The court held that, to preserve the subject matter of the petition and prevent the proceedings from being rendered nugatory, it was appropriate to grant an interim order of inhibition restraining registration of any dealings with the property pending inter partes hearing. The court declined to certify the application as urgent but directed that it be heard on a priority basis, emphasizing the need for proper service and an expedited hearing to...
Court Disposition
Interim inhibition order granted; application not certified urgent; costs in the cause; inter partes hearing scheduled.
Orders
- Prayer 2 is granted: interim order of inhibition restraining registration of dealings in L.R. No. Kathwana/1215 pending inter partes hearing.
- Application not certified urgent but to be heard on priority basis.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
53 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT & LAND COURT
AT CHUKA
CONSTITUTION PETITION NO. …03…..OF 2019
IN THE MATTER OF CONTRAVENTION OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS
UNDER ARTICLES 23(3), 27(1) & (2), 40 & 47 OF THE CONSTITUTION
AND
IN THE MATTER OF SECTIONS 25, 26, 27, 28 & 29 OF THE LAND ADJUDICATION ACT
AND
IN THE MATTER OF SECTIONS 26 & 110 OF THE LAND REGISTRATION ACT NO. 3 OF 2012
BETWEEN
SERAPHIN NDAGARA M’MWAMBA.......................................PETITIONER
AND
DAVID N. KANAMPIU........................................................1ST RESPONDENT
DISTRICT LAND ADJUDICATION & SETTLEMENT
OFFICER MERU SOUTH...................................................2ND RESPONDENT
DIRECTOR OF LAND ADJUDICATION.........................3RD RESPONDENT
LAND REGISTRAR, MERU SOUTH................................4TH RESPONDENT
CHIEF LAND REGISTRAR................................................5TH RESPONDENT
THE HONOURABLE ATTORNEY GENERAL...............6TH RESPONDENT
RULING
1. This application is dated 21. 5.2019 and seeks orders:
1. That this application be certified urgent.
2. That an interim order of inhibition do issue restraining the registration of dealings in L.R. No. Kathwana/1215 pending the interpartes hearing of this application.
3. That an order of inhibition do issue restraining the registration of dealing in L.R. No. Kathwana/1215 pending the hearing and determination of this application.
4. That costs of this application be provided for.
2. It has the following grounds:-
1. That the 1st Respondent is registered as the owner of L.R. No. Kathwana/1215.
2. That the said parcel of land is the subject of these proceedings.
3. That the 1st Respondent has put out the suit land for sale and various potential buyers have visited the same for inspection.
4. That unless dealings in respect of the suit land are inhibited, the 1st Respondent will move the suit land further from the reach of the petitioner.
5. That the purpose of this application is to preserve the suit land pending the determination of the issues at variance between the parties.
3. The application is buttressed by the affidavit of Seraphine Ndagara M’Mwamba sworn on 21st May, 2019 which states:
I, SERAPHINE NDAGARA M’MWAMBA an adult male person of sound mind and of P. O. Box 69 Marimanti do hereby make oath and state as follows:
1. That I am the Petitioner herein properly versed with all the issues stated herein.
2. That the subject matter of this Petition is L.R. No. Kathwana/1215 which is registered in the name of the 1st Respondent as can be deduced from the certificate of official search attached hereto.
3. That the 1st Respondent is soliciting for buyers of the suit property and has brought several potential purchasers to inspect the same.
4. That I am apprehensive that the 1st Respondent shall deal with the suit property in a manner that shall jeopardize the proper litigation of this petition.
5. That in the premises I humbly pray that an order of inhibition do issue to restrict any intended dealings with the suit property.
6. That it is in the interests of justice and fairness that these orders are sought.
7. That I depose to the foregoing believing the same to be true to the best of my knowledge, belief ad understanding.
4. At the exparte stage, Mr. Mark Muriithi, the applicant’s advocate asked the court to grant prayer 2 to preserve the suit property.
5. Upon perusal of the apposite pleadings, I order as follows:
a) The application is NOT certified urgent BUT will be heard on priority basis.
b) Prayer 2 is granted.
c) Costs shall be in the cause.
d) The applicant to property serve the application upon the respondent.
e) The application will be heard interpartes on 13. 6.2019 .
Delivered in open Court at Chuka this 27th day of May, 2019in the presence of:
CA: Ndegwa
Mark Muriithi for the applicant/appellant
P. M. NJOROGE
JUDGE