[2019] KEELC 3032 (KLR)

[2019] KEELC 3032 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had demonstrated sufficient grounds for the grant of an inhibition order. The evidence showed that the 1st respondent was actively seeking to sell the suit property, and there was a real risk that the subject matter of the petition could be rendered nugatory if the order was not...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEELC 3032 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Seraphin Ndagara M’Mwamba; Respondent: David N. Kanampiu; Respondent: District Land Adjudication & Settlement Officer Meru South; Respondent: Director of Land Adjudication; Respondent: Land Registrar, Meru South; Respondent: Chief Land Registrar; Respondent: The Honourable Attorney General
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Chuka
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Constitutional Petition 03 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Inhibition Order
Outcome
interlocutory inhibition order granted
Legal Topics
Inhibition Orders, Land Registration, Protection of Property Rights, Interlocutory Injunctions
Source Language
en
Land and Property Constitutional Law Inhibition Orders Land Registration Protection of Property Rights Interlocutory Injunctions

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Seraphin Ndagara M’Mwamba

Applicant

David N. Kanampiu

Respondent

District Land Adjudication & Settlement Officer Meru South

Respondent

Director of Land Adjudication

Respondent

Land Registrar, Meru South

Respondent

Chief Land Registrar

Respondent

The Honourable Attorney General

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Inhibition Order

  1. 1 Whether an order of inhibition should issue to restrain registration of dealings in L.R. No. Kathwana/1215 pending determination of the petition.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant has demonstrated sufficient grounds for preservation of the suit property.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had demonstrated sufficient grounds for the grant of an inhibition order. The evidence showed that the 1st respondent was actively seeking to sell the suit property, and there was a real risk that the subject matter of the petition could be rendered nugatory if the order was not granted. The court exercised its discretion to preserve the property and ensure the efficacy of the judicial process, holding that no satisfactory reason had been advanced by the respondent to deny the order. Accordingly, the court granted the inhibition order as sought in prayer 3 of the application.

Court Disposition

interlocutory inhibition order granted

Orders

  • An order of inhibition is issued restraining the registration of dealings in L.R. No. Kathwana/1215 pending the hearing and determination of the application.
  • Costs shall be in the cause.