[2019] KEELC 146 (KLR)

[2019] KEELC 146 (KLR)

The court found that Mr. Paul Ogunde of Walker Kontos Advocates, whose stamp appeared on the discharge of charge document central to the dispute, may be called as a witness regarding the transaction that is challenged for alleged fraud. Given the potential for Mr. Ogunde to be a material witness and the interests of...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEELC 146 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Sere Technologies Limited; Plaintiff: Dr. Davy Kiprotich Koech; Defendant: Forward Cars Limited; Defendant: Walter Kiprop Chumo; Defendant: HFC Limited; Defendant: Miriam Jepkosgei Maina; Defendant: Juma Wahaga Maulidi; Defendant: The Chief Land Registrar; Defendant: The Hon. Attorney General
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 246 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Disqualification of Advocates
Outcome
Application allowed in part.
Legal Topics
Advocate Conflict of Interest, Disqualification of Counsel, Fraudulent Land Transfer, Pleadings Striking Out
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Advocate Conflict of Interest Disqualification of Counsel Fraudulent Land Transfer Pleadings Striking Out

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sere Technologies Limited

Plaintiff

Dr. Davy Kiprotich Koech

Plaintiff

Forward Cars Limited

Defendant

Walter Kiprop Chumo

Defendant

HFC Limited

Defendant

Miriam Jepkosgei Maina

Defendant

Juma Wahaga Maulidi

Defendant

The Chief Land Registrar

Defendant

The Hon. Attorney General

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Disqualification of Advocates

  1. 1 Whether the firm of Walker Kontos Advocates should be barred from acting for the 3rd Defendant due to conflict of interest.
  2. 2 Whether pleadings filed by Walker Kontos Advocates on behalf of the 3rd Defendant should be struck out.
  3. 3 Whether the involvement of advocates in prior transactions relating to the suit property necessitates their disqualification from representing parties in the suit.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that Mr. Paul Ogunde of Walker Kontos Advocates, whose stamp appeared on the discharge of charge document central to the dispute, may be called as a witness regarding the transaction that is challenged for alleged fraud. Given the potential for Mr. Ogunde to be a material witness and the interests of justice, the court held that it would be improper for Walker Kontos Advocates to continue representing the 3rd Defendant. The court emphasized that the law does not automatically disqualify an advocate involved in a prior transaction, but where the advocate's testimony may be required on contested issues, disqualification is warranted. The court allowed the application to the...

Court Disposition

Application allowed in part.

Orders

  • The firm of Walker Kontos Advocates is barred from representing the 3rd Defendant in this suit.
  • Pleadings and documents filed by Walker Kontos Advocates on behalf of the 3rd Defendant shall remain on record.