[2023] KEELC 16809 (KLR)
The court found that the plaintiff had established a prima facie case with a probability of success based on his claim of adverse possession and long, uninterrupted occupation of the suit property. The court was satisfied that the plaintiff would suffer irreparable harm, including loss of sentimental value and disturbance of family graves, which could not be adequately compensated by damages if the defendant was allowed to interfere with the property. The balance of convenience favored the plaintiff, as the inconvenience to him would be greater than to the defendant if the injunction was not granted. The court also found that the plaintiff was entitled to an order of inhibition to...
- Citation
- [2023] KEELC 16809 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Erick Ochieng Sewe; Defendant: Michael Owino Ogutu
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Siaya
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 13 April 2023
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case E022 of 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Environment and Land Case / Ruling on Interlocutory Injunction Application
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's application for temporary injunction and inhibition granted.
- Judges
- AY Koross
- Legal Topics
- Adverse Possession, Temporary Injunctions, Interlocutory Orders, Land Registration, Quiet Possession
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Erick Ochieng Sewe
Plaintiff
Michael Owino Ogutu
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Case / Ruling on Interlocutory Injunction Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff has met the threshold for grant of a temporary injunction restraining the defendant from interfering with land parcel North Ugenya/Sega/350 pending determination of the suit.
- 2 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to an order of inhibition restricting registration of any disposition in respect of the suit property.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the plaintiff had established a prima facie case with a probability of success based on his claim of adverse possession and long, uninterrupted occupation of the suit property. The court was satisfied that the plaintiff would suffer irreparable harm, including loss of sentimental value and disturbance of family graves, which could not be adequately compensated by damages if the defendant was allowed to interfere with the property. The balance of convenience favored the plaintiff, as the inconvenience to him would be greater than to the defendant if the injunction was not granted. The court also found that the plaintiff was entitled to an order of inhibition to...
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's application for temporary injunction and inhibition granted.
Orders
- An order of temporary injunction is issued for one year restraining the defendant, his agents, employees, relatives, or any person deriving authority from him from entering, constructing on, alienating, cultivating, or in any manner interfering with the plaintiff’s quiet possession, ownership, and occupation of land...
- An order of inhibition is issued restricting registration of any disposition in the register of land parcel North Ugenya/Sega 350 until the suit is heard and determined.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment