[2023] KEHC 3132 (KLR)

[2023] KEHC 3132 (KLR)

The court found that although the defendant had only partially complied with the conditional orders of the judgment (by paying the principal sum but not the full interest), the existence of a pending appeal and a subsisting order of stay of execution precluded the court from entering final judgment or granting the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEHC 3132 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Seyani Brothers & Company (K) Limited; Defendant: Affiliated Business Contractors Limited
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Suit 178 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Entry of Judgment and Related Orders
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
A Mshila
Legal Topics
Enforcement of Judgments, Conditional Orders, Interest on Awards, Stay of Execution
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Commercial and Corporate Enforcement of Judgments Conditional Orders Interest on Awards Stay of Execution

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Seyani Brothers & Company (K) Limited

Plaintiff

Affiliated Business Contractors Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Entry of Judgment and Related Orders

  1. 1 Whether the court should enter judgment for the plaintiff against the defendant for failing to comply with the court’s conditional order.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that although the defendant had only partially complied with the conditional orders of the judgment (by paying the principal sum but not the full interest), the existence of a pending appeal and a subsisting order of stay of execution precluded the court from entering final judgment or granting the further reliefs sought by the applicant. The court held that the issue of interest and any further execution must await the outcome of the appeal, and it would be improper to proceed otherwise. Consequently, the application was dismissed as devoid of merit, and each party was ordered to bear its own costs.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The Notice of Motion dated November 3, 2021 is dismissed.
  • Each party to bear its own costs.