[2017] KEHC 3580 (KLR)
The court found that, given the nature of the offence (malicious damage to property against the appellant's own mother), the reconciliation between the parties, and the positive probation report recommending a community service order, it was appropriate to revise the custodial sentence. Section 3 of the Community...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] KEHC 3580 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Shaban Okila alias Johnston Okila; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kabarnet
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application 60 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- Sentence of imprisonment revised to community service order; appeal determined.
- Judges
- EM Muriithi
- Legal Topics
- Malicious Damage to Property, Sentencing, Community Service Orders, Alternative Dispute Resolution
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Shaban Okila alias Johnston Okila
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence of imprisonment for 3 years for malicious damage to property should be substituted with a community service order.
- 2 Whether reconciliation between the appellant and the complainant (his mother) justifies a non-custodial sentence.
- 3 Whether the requirements of section 3 of the Community Service Orders Act and Article 159 of the Constitution are met.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that, given the nature of the offence (malicious damage to property against the appellant's own mother), the reconciliation between the parties, and the positive probation report recommending a community service order, it was appropriate to revise the custodial sentence. Section 3 of the Community Service Orders Act specifically allows for community service orders where the sentence is three years or less. The court also considered Article 159 of the Constitution, which encourages alternative dispute resolution. The court concluded that the interests of justice would be served by substituting the remaining custodial sentence with a community service order for 12 months, as...
Court Disposition
Sentence of imprisonment revised to community service order; appeal determined.
Orders
- The appellant to serve community service for a period of 12 months at a place to be determined by the Community Service Officer, Baringo.
- The sentence of imprisonment for 3 years imposed by the trial court is revised accordingly pursuant to section 364 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
25 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KABARNET
MISC CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 60 OF 2017
SHABAN OKILA ALIAS JOHNSTON OKILA......................................................APPLICANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC.........................................................................................................RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT
1. When this appeal came up for hearing, counsel for the DPP informed the Court that they had received a reconciliation note and they wished to consider it before the matter could proceed to hearing of the appeal and indicated they did not oppose reconciliation.
2. The appellant indicated his willingness to have the Court consider reconciliation pointing out that the complainant in his criminal proceedings the subject of his trial for which appeal is preferred was his mother.
3. The Court then directed that the Probation Officer to file report on the appellant and the circumstances of the case for purposes of consideration of Community Service Order. The report, which was filed on 24/8/2017, was positive for community service order.
4. The appellant was sentenced to imprisonment for 3 years for the offence of malicious damage to property contrary to section 339(1) of the Penal Code on 21/11/2016. At the time of the hearing in this Court the appellant had served 9 months of the 3-year sentence, which with possible remission would be 24 months.
5. Section 3 of the Community Service Orders Act requires the Court to consider Community Service Order as suitable sentence for cases where imprisonment is for a period of 3 years or less.
6. In addition, Article 159 of the Constitution requires the Court to promote alternative dispute resolution mechanism.
Determination
7. Having considered that the nature of the offence herein is one of malicious damage of property of the appellant’s own mother and the fact as considered by the Probation Officers’ report of 24/8/2017 and confirmation by the said appellant before the Court that she had forgiven the appellant whom she considered had learnt his lesson, and taking into account section 3 of the Community Service Order Act, I agree with the Probation Officer’s Recommendation for a Community Service Order in this matter.
Order
8. Accordingly, the appellant who has already served 9 of the possible 24 months (with remission) will now serve Community Service for a period of 12 months at a place to be determined by the Community Service Officer, Baringo.
9. For this reason, the sentence of imprisonment for 3 years imposed by the trial Court is, pursuant to section 364 of the Criminal Procedure Code, revised accordingly.
10. Appeal No. KBT CR App No. 175/2017 is marked determined in terms of the orders herein.
DATED AND DELIVERED THIS 13TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2017.
EDWARD M. MURIITHI
JUDGE
Appearances:
Appellant in person
Ms Onkoba for DPP