[2015] KECA 65 (KLR)

[2015] KECA 65 (KLR)

The court found that the relevant date for the commencement of the period for filing the record of appeal was 19th November 2014, being the date proceedings were delivered to the respondent as evidenced by the certificate of delay. Applying Rule 82(1) and (2) of the Court of Appeal Rules and excluding the Christmas...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] KECA 65 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Shadrack Abraham Kisongoch; Respondent: Kenya Airports Authority
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Application 83 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Application to Strike Out Notice of Appeal
Outcome
application dismissed with costs
Judges
S ole Kantai
Legal Topics
Appeal Timelines, Record of Appeal Filing, Certificate of Delay, Court of Appeal Rules
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Appeal Timelines Record of Appeal Filing Certificate of Delay Court of Appeal Rules

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Shadrack Abraham Kisongoch

Applicant

Kenya Airports Authority

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Application to Strike Out Notice of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the respondent's record of appeal was filed out of time without leave of court.
  2. 2 Whether the notice of appeal should be struck out for non-compliance with prescribed timelines.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the relevant date for the commencement of the period for filing the record of appeal was 19th November 2014, being the date proceedings were delivered to the respondent as evidenced by the certificate of delay. Applying Rule 82(1) and (2) of the Court of Appeal Rules and excluding the Christmas vacation as per Order 50 Rule 4 of the Civil Procedure Rules, the last date for filing the record of appeal was 9th February 2015. Since the respondent filed the record of appeal on 21st January 2015, it was within the prescribed time. Therefore, the application to strike out the notice of appeal lacked merit and was dismissed with costs.

Court Disposition

application dismissed with costs

Orders

  • The application to strike out the notice of appeal is dismissed with costs to the respondent.