[2015] KECA 65 (KLR)
The court found that the relevant date for the commencement of the period for filing the record of appeal was 19th November 2014, being the date proceedings were delivered to the respondent as evidenced by the certificate of delay. Applying Rule 82(1) and (2) of the Court of Appeal Rules and excluding the Christmas...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2015] KECA 65 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Shadrack Abraham Kisongoch; Respondent: Kenya Airports Authority
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Court Station
- Court of Appeal at Kisumu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Application 83 of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Application to Strike Out Notice of Appeal
- Outcome
- application dismissed with costs
- Judges
- S ole Kantai
- Legal Topics
- Appeal Timelines, Record of Appeal Filing, Certificate of Delay, Court of Appeal Rules
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Shadrack Abraham Kisongoch
Applicant
Kenya Airports Authority
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Application to Strike Out Notice of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent's record of appeal was filed out of time without leave of court.
- 2 Whether the notice of appeal should be struck out for non-compliance with prescribed timelines.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the relevant date for the commencement of the period for filing the record of appeal was 19th November 2014, being the date proceedings were delivered to the respondent as evidenced by the certificate of delay. Applying Rule 82(1) and (2) of the Court of Appeal Rules and excluding the Christmas vacation as per Order 50 Rule 4 of the Civil Procedure Rules, the last date for filing the record of appeal was 9th February 2015. Since the respondent filed the record of appeal on 21st January 2015, it was within the prescribed time. Therefore, the application to strike out the notice of appeal lacked merit and was dismissed with costs.
Court Disposition
application dismissed with costs
Orders
- The application to strike out the notice of appeal is dismissed with costs to the respondent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
33 paragraphs
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL
AT KISUMU
(CORAM: MARAGA, AZANGALALA & KANTAI JJ.A)
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 83 OF 2014
BETWEEN
SHADRACK ABRAHAM KISONGOCH.........................APPLICANT
AND
KENYA AIRPORTS AUTHORITY.............................RESPONDENT
(An Application to strike out the Notice of Appeal dated 23rd November 2014and filed
on 24th September 2014being an intended appeal from the judgment of the
High Court of Kenya at Kisumu,Industrial Court (Wasilwa, J.)
dated 17th September, 2014
in
INDUSTRIAL CAUSE NO. 20 OF 2014)
*****************************
RULING OF THE COURT
1. This is an application brought under Rules 42(1), 43(1), 83and 84 of the Court of Appeal to strike out the respondent's notice of appeal dated 23rd September, 2014 and lodged in court the following day.
2. The application is premised on the ground that the record of appeal filed pursuant to that notice of appeal was filed out of the prescribed period without leave of court.
3. According to counsel for the applicant, the High Court proceedings having been ready for collection on 31st October 2014, even after excluding the Christmas vacation when, as stated in Order 50 Rule 4 of the Civil Procedure Rules,time does not run for purposes of filing pleadings in civil cases, the respondent should have filed its record of appeal by 22nd January 2015.
4. The proviso to Rule 82(1) of the Court of Appeal Rules read together with sub-rule (2) of that Rule provides that where the letter bespeaking of proceedings is filed in court within thirty days of the date of the decision sought to be appealed and a copy thereof is served upon the respondent, as was done in this case, for purposes of filing the record of appeal, time starts to run from the date of "delivery" of the proceedings.
5. In this case, as stated on the certificate of delay a copy of which is annexed to the replying affidavit, proceedings were delivered to counsel for the respondent on 19th November, 2014. In the circumstances, and excluding the 2014 Christmas vacation, the last date for filing the record of appeal in this case was 9th February, 2015 but the same was filed on 21st January, 2015. Counsel for the applicant himself conceded that if we find, as we have, that time started running on 19th November 2014, then the record in this appeal was filed in time. Consequently we find no merit in this application and we accordingly dismiss it with costs.
DATED and delivered at Kisumu this 14th day of May, 2015.
D.K.MARAGA
.................................
JUDGE OF APPEAL
F. AZANGALALA
.................................
JUDGE OF APPEAL
S. ole KANTAI
.................................
JUDGE OF APPEAL
I certify that this is a true copy of the original.
DEPUTY REGISTRAR