[2005] KEHC 1298 (KLR)
The court held that execution cannot issue solely on the basis of a certificate of costs following taxation. Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act provides that the certificate is final as to the amount, but the court must make an order in relation to the certificate, including entering judgment for the sum certified....
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2005] KEHC 1298 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Shah & Parekh; Respondent: Apollo Insurance Co. Ltd
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- ? 257 of 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution
- Outcome
- stay of execution granted
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Taxation of Costs, Certificate of Costs, Judgment Entry
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Shah & Parekh
Applicant
Apollo Insurance Co. Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether execution can issue on a certificate of costs without a judgment being entered by the court.
- 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to a stay of execution in the absence of a judgment.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that execution cannot issue solely on the basis of a certificate of costs following taxation. Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act provides that the certificate is final as to the amount, but the court must make an order in relation to the certificate, including entering judgment for the sum certified. Since no such judgment had been entered in this case, the court found that execution proceedings were premature. Accordingly, the court ordered a stay of execution until judgment is entered for the taxed sum, emphasizing that the statutory process requires a formal court order before execution can proceed on taxed costs.
Court Disposition
stay of execution granted
Orders
- Execution proceedings are stayed until such time as a judgment is entered for the taxed sum.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
20 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
Misc Appli 257 of 2003
SHAH & PAREKH………………………………..…………APPLICANT
VERSUS
APOLLO INSURANCE CO. LTD………………………RESPONDENT
RULING
By its application of the 7th September 2004 the Applicant seeks an order for stay of execution of a decree or order. However, no decree or order is referred to and so far as l can ascertain no decree or order has been issued in this matter.
What the Applicants complain of is that pursuant to a certificate of taxation dated the 21st July 2003 a warrant of attachment was issued against the Respondent / Applicant by way of certificate of costs.
This application is brought under Rule 3 (1) (2) and (3) of the High court (Practice and Procedure) Rules Order XX1 rules 18 and 22 Order XX rule 7 of the Civil Procedure Rules, Section 63 and 3A of the Civil Procedure Act and Sections 48 and 49 of the Advocates Act. (Cap 16).
The Grounds of Opposition is that the Application is misconceived and an abuse of the process of the court and brought under irrelevant provisions of the law. A third ground is that the Applicant has soiled hands. I do not consider this last ground to be relevant as the reason that the Applicant refused to pay taxed costs cannot affect its right to object to the right, if any, of the Respondent to seek to execute a certificate of costs. So far as the provisions of the law relied on are concerned none of them give a right to the Respondent apart from Section 3A namely that the execution process is an abuse of the process of the Court.
Section 48(1) of the Advocates Act forbids an advocate from filing a suit to recover costs unless a bill has been delivered and one month thereafter has expired.
The reason for this suspension of a right to bring an action is to allow the client time to require the advocate to tax his costs.
Section 51 (2) of the Advocates Act states as follows:
The certificate of the taxing officer by whom any bill has been taxed shall, unless it is set aside or altered by the court, be final as to the amount of the costs covered thereby, and the court may make such order in relation thereto as it thinks fit, including, in a case where the retainer is not in dispute, an order that judgment be entered for the sum certified to be due with costs.
The court is the High Court.
I am of the view that before execution can issue in respect of a certificate of costs it is necessary for the court to make such order in relation thereto as it thinks fit. It is, therefore, necessary for an application to be made to the court for an order that judgment be entered in the sum taxed.
In this case there is no such judgment. I therefore stay the execution proceedings until such time as a judgment is so entered.
DATED and DELIVERED at NAIROBI ON 4TH FEBRUARY 2005
P.J RANSLEY
JUDGE