[2025] KEELC 3675 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant's failure to attend court was due to genuine technological challenges and not deliberate conduct. The court noted that the suit had been marked as closed, not dismissed, and that the applicant had provided a satisfactory explanation for the absence. In the interest of justice and...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] KEELC 3675 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Anand Kantilal Shah; Respondent: Willy Kimagur Rop; Respondent: The Chief Land Registrar
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Nakuru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case E054 of 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Closure of Suit
- Outcome
- Application allowed; suit re-opened.
- Judges
- A Ombwayo
- Legal Topics
- Review of Orders, Reinstatement of Suit, Non Attendance, Procedural Fairness
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Anand Kantilal Shah
Applicant
Willy Kimagur Rop
Respondent
The Chief Land Registrar
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Closure of Suit
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should review and set aside the order marking the suit as closed due to non-attendance by counsel.
- 2 Whether technological challenges constitute sufficient cause for non-attendance.
- 3 Whether the applicant is entitled to reinstatement of the suit.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant's failure to attend court was due to genuine technological challenges and not deliberate conduct. The court noted that the suit had been marked as closed, not dismissed, and that the applicant had provided a satisfactory explanation for the absence. In the interest of justice and fair hearing, the court exercised its discretion to re-open the suit and set it down for mention and further directions, ensuring that the parties would have an opportunity to be heard on the merits.
Court Disposition
Application allowed; suit re-opened.
Orders
- The suit is re-opened and reinstated for hearing on the merits.
- Mention scheduled for 25th June 2025 for directions.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
21 paragraphs
Shah v Rop & another (Environment & Land Case E054 of 2021) [2025] KEELC 3675 (KLR) (9 May 2025) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2025] KEELC 3675 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Environment and Land Court at Nakuru
Environment & Land Case E054 of 2021
A Ombwayo, J
May 9, 2025
Between
Anand Kantilal Shah
Applicant
and
Willy Kimagur Rop
1st Respondent
The Chief Land Registrar
2nd Respondent
Ruling
1. Honorable Court be pleased to review and or set aside the orders of 25th February 2025, dismissing / striking out the suit herein. This suit be reinstated and set down for hearing and determination of the interested parties claim on merit. Costs of the application be provided for.
2. The application is based on grounds that the Honorable Court had given directions in the ruling dated 7th November 2024 that parties be served with the interested parties defence and any other documents. That the parties were served with the interested parties defence and counter claim on 14th December, 2024. The matter came for mention on the 25th February 2025, however counsel for the interested parties had network related challenges, due to gadget failure and hence was not able to handle the matter when it was called out.
3. That he later managed to get back learnt the matter had been called out and suit dismissed. He argues that the failure to be present and address the court was not deliberate but due to technological challenges beyond his control. The same were not his own making and thus the interested parties should not suffer as a result of that.
4. The supporting affidavit reiterates the grounds of the application. this application appears not opposed. This court finds that the suit was marked as closed and not dismissed by the court. I do note that the interested parties have given good reason for their failure to attend court. I do order that the suit be re-opened. Mention on 25th June 2025 for directions.
SIGNED BY: HON. JUSTICE ANTONY O. OMBWAYOTHE JUDICIARY OF KENYA.NAKURU ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURTENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURTDATE: 2025-05-09 11:50:56