[2024] KEELC 6539 (KLR)

[2024] KEELC 6539 (KLR)

The court adopted the consent as its order, recognizing that the parties, through their advocates, freely agreed to the terms regarding the survey and determination of the boundaries of the disputed land parcels. The court found no reason to interfere with the consent, as it was properly executed and addressed the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEELC 6539 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Ibrahim Shalle (Suing on behalf of the Estate of Shalle Hirbo Lolo); Defendant: Marsabit Township Women Group; Defendant: Land Surveyor, Marsabit County; Defendant: Land Registrar, Isiolo; Defendant: Marsabit County
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Isiolo
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Miscellaneous Case 6 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Adoption of Consent
Outcome
Consent adopted as order of the court.
Judges
PM Njoroge
Legal Topics
Land Parcel Boundaries, Survey Disputes, Consent Orders
Source Language
en
Land and Property Land Parcel Boundaries Survey Disputes Consent Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ibrahim Shalle (Suing on behalf of the Estate of Shalle Hirbo Lolo)

Plaintiff

Marsabit Township Women Group

Defendant

Land Surveyor, Marsabit County

Defendant

Land Registrar, Isiolo

Defendant

Marsabit County

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Adoption of Consent

  1. 1 Whether the consent between the parties regarding the survey and determination of land parcel boundaries should be adopted as an order of the court.
  2. 2 Whether the parties should share the costs of the survey and be allowed to engage their own surveyors.

Ratio Decidendi

The court adopted the consent as its order, recognizing that the parties, through their advocates, freely agreed to the terms regarding the survey and determination of the boundaries of the disputed land parcels. The court found no reason to interfere with the consent, as it was properly executed and addressed the issues in dispute. The consent provided for a joint site visit by the County Surveyor, the liberty for parties to engage their own surveyors, the filing of a report within 30 days, and equal sharing of costs. The court's role was limited to formalizing the agreement as an order, ensuring procedural fairness and efficiency in resolving the boundary dispute.

Court Disposition

Consent adopted as order of the court.

Orders

  • The County Surveyor, Marsabit County, to visit the locus in quo with the parties to establish the total acreage of land parcels Marsabit/Mountain/2947 and 2948.
  • To establish the extent of land parcels Marsabit/Mountain/2947 & 2948 vis-a-vis each other.