[2024] KEELC 7365 (KLR)

[2024] KEELC 7365 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiffs had occupied the suit property openly, continuously, and exclusively for over 12 years, building permanent and semi-permanent structures and living on the land to the exclusion of the registered owner. The evidence included oral testimony, affidavits, a certificate of title, and a...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEELC 7365 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Omar Salim Shee & 72 others; Defendant: Asmuhar Developer Limited
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 187 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Case / Judgment
Outcome
judgment for the plaintiffs
Judges
SM Kibunja
Legal Topics
Adverse Possession, Title to Land, Proof of Possession, Limitation of Actions, Uncontested Claims, Survey Evidence
Source Language
english
Land and Property Adverse Possession Title to Land Proof of Possession Limitation of Actions Uncontested Claims Survey Evidence

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Omar Salim Shee & 72 others

Plaintiff

Asmuhar Developer Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Environment and Land Case / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiffs have met the threshold to be declared as proprietors of the suit property under adverse possession.
  2. 2 Who is liable to pay the costs of the suit.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiffs had occupied the suit property openly, continuously, and exclusively for over 12 years, building permanent and semi-permanent structures and living on the land to the exclusion of the registered owner. The evidence included oral testimony, affidavits, a certificate of title, and a surveyor's report confirming the number and nature of structures on the land. The defendant, despite being served through substituted service, did not appear or contest the claim. The court held that the plaintiffs had discharged their burden of proof to the required standard and satisfied the legal requirements for adverse possession. Accordingly, the plaintiffs were entitled...

Court Disposition

judgment for the plaintiffs

Orders

  • Prayers (1) to (3) of the amended originating summons dated 1st February 2021 are granted, declaring the plaintiffs proprietors of LR No. 8844/1/MN by adverse possession and directing issuance of title.
  • Each party to bear their own costs.