[2024] KEELC 4373 (KLR)

[2024] KEELC 4373 (KLR)

The court found that the defendant failed to provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate that the subject matter and reliefs sought in the pending petition and the current suit are the same, as required under section 6 of the Civil Procedure Act. The defendant did not attach a copy of the petition or otherwise show...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEELC 4373 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Abdalla Athman Sheelali; Defendant: Kivulini Cottages Limited
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Malindi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 45 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion / Ruling on Preliminary Objection/application to Strike Out Plaint
Outcome
application dismissed with costs to the respondent
Judges
FM Njoroge
Legal Topics
Sub Judice Principle, Striking Out Pleadings, Abuse of Court Process, Ownership Disputes
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Sub Judice Principle Striking Out Pleadings Abuse of Court Process Ownership Disputes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Abdalla Athman Sheelali

Plaintiff

Kivulini Cottages Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Notice of Motion / Ruling on Preliminary Objection/application to Strike Out Plaint

  1. 1 Whether the suit is sub judice in light of a previously instituted petition between the same parties.
  2. 2 Whether the plaint should be struck out as an abuse of court process.
  3. 3 Whether the application meets the threshold under section 6 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the defendant failed to provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate that the subject matter and reliefs sought in the pending petition and the current suit are the same, as required under section 6 of the Civil Procedure Act. The defendant did not attach a copy of the petition or otherwise show that the issues in both matters are directly and substantially the same. The court emphasized that different methods of commencing action (petition versus plaint) may serve different purposes, and the mere assertion of fraud in the supporting affidavit was insufficient to establish the sub judice bar. Consequently, the application to strike out the plaint and vacate previous...

Court Disposition

application dismissed with costs to the respondent

Orders

  • The defendant's application dated 27th November 2023 is dismissed with costs to the respondent.
  • Parties shall comply with the Civil Procedure Rules in readiness for hearing.