[2014] KEHC 511 (KLR)
The court found that while the applicant has a constitutional right to bail and her medical condition is a relevant consideration, the primary issue is the risk of absconding. The applicant's ties to the United States and the concerns of the deceased's family regarding flight risk were deemed valid. However, the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2014] KEHC 511 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Sheila Wanjiku Kibinge; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 31 of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Bail Application / Ruling on Bail Pending Trial
- Outcome
- Bail granted with stringent conditions.
- Legal Topics
- Bail Application, Flight Risk, Presumption of Innocence, Right to Fair Trial
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sheila Wanjiku Kibinge
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Bail Application / Ruling on Bail Pending Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to bail pending trial under Article 49(i) h of the Constitution.
- 2 Whether the applicant poses a flight risk if released on bail.
- 3 Whether the applicant's medical condition justifies her release on bail.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that while the applicant has a constitutional right to bail and her medical condition is a relevant consideration, the primary issue is the risk of absconding. The applicant's ties to the United States and the concerns of the deceased's family regarding flight risk were deemed valid. However, the court determined that stringent bail conditions, including a substantial cash bail, sureties, surrender of travel documents, and regular court attendance, would sufficiently mitigate the risk of flight. Therefore, the applicant was granted bail subject to these conditions, balancing her constitutional rights with the interests of justice and the need to ensure her attendance at...
Court Disposition
Bail granted with stringent conditions.
Orders
- Applicant to execute a cash bail of Kshs.1,000,000 with two sureties of Kshs.1,000,000 each.
- Applicant to deposit her passport and any other travel documents with the court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
31 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
CRIMINAL CASE NO. 31 OF 2014
SHEILA WANJIKU KIBINGE.........................APPLICANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC.................................................RESPONDENT
RULING
The accused Sheila Wanjiku Kibinge is charged with the offence of murder contrary to section 203 as read with section 204 of the Penal Code. According to the information filed by the Director of Public Prosecutions on 22nd April, 2014, she murdered one Leonard Kibinge Kiruri on the night of 14th/15th April 2014 at Gitaru VillageinKikuyu Sub-County within Kiambu County.
When arraigned in court on 23rd April 2014, she denied the charge and was remanded in custody pending the hearing of the case which is yet to commence.
In her application dated 28th April 2014, and supported by her Affidavit sworn on the same day, she avers that she has right to bail under Article 49(i) h of the Constitution; that she has a right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty; that her continued detention undermines her constitutional rights to be presumed innocent; that she has no intention of interfering with witnesses. She further avers that she is 53 years old and suffers from arthritis and a back problem which requires constant specialized medical attention.
The State has opposed the application through the replying affidavit of No. 63373 Corporal Joseph Kaundawho is the investigating officer in the case. He says at paragraph 4 & 5 that the accused is likely to escape from the lawful custody of the court if granted bail. Owing to the likelihood of conviction and the attendant sentence of death.
At the hearing of the application on 5th June 2014, Mr. Kongo for the State opposed the application while relying on the replying affidavit of Corporal Joseph Kaunda. He underscored the seriousness of the offence and the likely sentence that the accused was likely to suffer upon conviction owing to the evidence against her. Mr. Mbuthia for the accused discounted the averments in the replying affidavit of Corporal Joseph Kaunda and the submissions of prosecution counsel Mr. Konga. He urged the court to release the accused stating that she would attend court whenever required.
I called for a pre-bail probation officer’s report in respect of the accused. The report states that the accused has been living in the United States of America and that the deceased’s family is apprehensive that she may be a flight risk. I have considered the opposing affidavit and submissions as well as the detailed contents of the probation report. I find that the key issue in this application is the likelihood of the accused absconding the trial. I have also considered the submission that the accused suffers a medical condition which requires specialized medical attention. I consider the fear of the prosecution that the accused was a flight risk to be valid given that the accused has a base in the United States of America. I however consider that bail conditions would minimize the risk of flight.
Having considered the application in its entirety I am persuaded to grant the applicant bail on the conditions that she shall:-
Execute a Cash bail of Kshs.1,000,000/- with two
sureties of Kshs.1,000,000/- each.
Deposit her passport and any other travel documents with the court.
Not leave the jurisdiction of this court without an order of the court.
Shall not in any manner whatsoever interfere with orcommunicate with witnesses in any way. Any such interference shall lead to the automatic cancellation of this bond.
Attend the monthly mention of her case before the
Deputy Registrar of the Court. The first of such mention shall be on 28th August, 2014.
Any violation of the above conditions to lead to automatic cancellation of the bail.
Orders accordingly.
Ruling deliveredanddatedatNairobithis21stday ofJuly, 2014
R. LAGAT-KORIR
JUDGE
In the presence of
…........................: Court clerk
…........................: Accused
…........................: For accused
…........................: For State