[2018] KEELRC 864 (KLR)

[2018] KEELRC 864 (KLR)

The court found that the Claimant was lawfully recruited and served as area chief, and that the allegations of forgery were unsubstantiated. The Kenya National Examination Council confirmed the authenticity of the Claimant's KCSE results, and the criminal case against him was withdrawn. The Respondent failed to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELRC 864 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Shem Ombati Otachi; Respondent: The Hon. Attorney General (on behalf of Ministry of Interior and Coordination of National Government)
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 379 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
judgment for the claimant
Judges
MN Nduma
Legal Topics
Unlawful Termination, Reinstatement, Disciplinary Procedure, Employment Benefits
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Unlawful Termination Reinstatement Disciplinary Procedure Employment Benefits

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Shem Ombati Otachi

Applicant

The Hon. Attorney General (on behalf of Ministry of Interior and Coordination of National Government)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the termination of the Claimant's employment was lawful.
  2. 2 Whether the Claimant was entitled to reinstatement to his former position.
  3. 3 Whether the Claimant was entitled to arrear salary and accrued allowances for the period served but unpaid.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Claimant was lawfully recruited and served as area chief, and that the allegations of forgery were unsubstantiated. The Kenya National Examination Council confirmed the authenticity of the Claimant's KCSE results, and the criminal case against him was withdrawn. The Respondent failed to conduct any proper disciplinary proceedings or provide evidence to justify the termination. The court held that the termination was unlawful, violated statutory provisions, and the Claimant did not contribute to his dismissal. Consequently, the Claimant was entitled to reinstatement to his former position without loss of benefits, payment of arrear salary for the period served but...

Court Disposition

judgment for the claimant

Orders

  • The Respondent is directed to reinstate the Claimant to the position of Chief for Ikuruma Location, Ngenyi Division, Marani Sub-County, Kisii County or to an equivalent position without loss of status, salary, allowances, and other benefits from the date of unlawful termination.
  • The Respondent is directed to pay the Claimant arrear salary for the period 20th December, 2013 to 11th August, 2015 at the rate of Kshs.19,323 per month and other accrued allowances.