[2024] KEHC 15772 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant, having served the majority of his thirty-year sentence for robbery with violence and with only one year and three months remaining, is eligible for sentence review under the Chief Justice Memo on prison decongestion. The court exercised its discretion to substitute the remaining...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEHC 15772 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Tetu Ole Shepha; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kibera
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Revision 263 of 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Revision / Ruling
- Outcome
- Application for sentence review allowed; custodial sentence substituted with non-custodial sentence.
- Judges
- DR Kavedza
- Legal Topics
- Sentence Review, Robbery With Violence, Prison Decongestion
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tetu Ole Shepha
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is eligible for sentence review under the Chief Justice Memo on prison decongestion.
- 2 Whether the applicant should be released to serve a non-custodial sentence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant, having served the majority of his thirty-year sentence for robbery with violence and with only one year and three months remaining, is eligible for sentence review under the Chief Justice Memo on prison decongestion. The court exercised its discretion to substitute the remaining custodial sentence with a non-custodial sentence, directing the applicant to report to the Kajiado Probation office for a period of three years. This decision was made in the interest of prison decongestion and in recognition of the applicant's eligibility for non-custodial measures at the tail end of his sentence.
Court Disposition
Application for sentence review allowed; custodial sentence substituted with non-custodial sentence.
Orders
- The applicant is released from prison to serve a non-custodial sentence.
- The applicant shall report to Kajiado Probation office for a period of three years.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
19 paragraphs
Shepha v Republic (Criminal Revision 263 of 2024) [2024] KEHC 15772 (KLR) (13 December 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 15772 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Kibera
Criminal Revision 263 of 2024
DR Kavedza, J
December 13, 2024
Between
Tetu Ole Shepha
Applicant
and
Republic
Respondent
Ruling
1. This file was opened for purposes of considering whether the convict Isaac Juma is suitable for consideration of their sentence review in the spirit of prison decongestion pursuant to the Chief Justice Memo dated 7th December 2022.
2. The applicant was convicted on 21st March 2006 for the offence of robbery with violence contrary to section 296(2) of the penal code. He was sentenced to thirty (30) years imprisonment.
3. The applicant is remaining with one year and three months of his prison sentence. I therefore find that the Applicant is eligible for a non-custodial sentence and release him for a non-custodial sentence.
4. The appellant is directed to report to Kajiado Probation office for a period of three years.Orders accordingly.
RULING DATED AND DELIVERED VIRTUALLY THIS 13TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2024. ......................D. KAVEDZAJUDGE