[2021] KEHC 2885 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 2885 (KLR)

The court found that the delay in filing the application for leave to appeal out of time was not inordinate and was satisfactorily explained by the applicants. The applicants expressed a reasonable apprehension that the decretal sum may not be recoverable if the appeal succeeds, and the respondent did not provide...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 2885 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Sheriff Ibrahim Mishsim; Applicant: Rahabmuiruri Waithira; Respondent: SA (Minor suing through father and next friend BOO)
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Application E214 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time and Stay of Execution
Outcome
application allowed with conditions
Judges
BT Jaden
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal Out of Time, Stay of Execution, Decretal Sum Security, Delay in Filing Appeal
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Leave to Appeal Out of Time Stay of Execution Decretal Sum Security Delay in Filing Appeal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sheriff Ibrahim Mishsim

Applicant

Rahabmuiruri Waithira

Applicant

SA (Minor suing through father and next friend BOO)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time and Stay of Execution

  1. 1 Whether the applicants should be granted leave to appeal out of time against the lower court judgment.
  2. 2 Whether a stay of execution of the judgment and decree should be granted pending appeal.
  3. 3 Whether the delay in filing the application was inordinate or satisfactorily explained.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the delay in filing the application for leave to appeal out of time was not inordinate and was satisfactorily explained by the applicants. The applicants expressed a reasonable apprehension that the decretal sum may not be recoverable if the appeal succeeds, and the respondent did not provide evidence of ability to refund the sum. Applying the principles under Order 42 rule 6(2) of the Civil Procedure Rules and relevant case law, the court determined that the interests of justice required granting the application, subject to the condition that the decretal sum be deposited in a joint interest-earning account or in court within 30 days, and the appeal be filed within...

Court Disposition

application allowed with conditions

Orders

  • Leave to appeal out of time is granted.
  • Stay of execution of the judgment and decree is granted pending appeal, on condition that the decretal sum is deposited in a joint interest earning bank account of the parties or in court within 30 days.