Shiboko & 2 others v Chungani & 3 others (Cause E001 of 2026) [2026] KEELRC 1424 (KLR) (26 May 2026) (Ruling)

Shiboko & 2 others v Chungani & 3 others (Cause E001 of 2026) [2026] KEELRC 1424 (KLR) (26 May 2026) (Ruling)

The court found that there was evidence of a related matter already filed before the Kakamega Chief Magistrate's Court and, relying on its supervisory powers over employment and labour relations matters, stayed the proceedings in this cause pending determination of the provenance of this suit.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2026] KEELRC 1424 (KLR)
Parties
1st Claimant: Paul Shiboko; 2nd Claimant: Musa Nasoro; 3rd Claimant: Emily Ligami; Respondent: Patrick Chungani – Executive Secretary (KNUT) Kakamega East Branch & 3 others
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause E001 of 2026
Procedural Posture
Employment and Labour Relations Cause / Ruling on Stay of Proceedings
Outcome
Proceedings stayed pending determination of the provenance of the suit.
Judges
["Nzioki wa Makau"]
Legal Topics
Stay of Proceedings, Parallel Proceedings, Jurisdiction of the Employment and Labour Relations Court, Sub Judice/provenance of Suit
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Law Civil Procedure Judicial Supervision Stay of Proceedings Parallel Proceedings Jurisdiction of the Employment and Labour Relations Court Sub Judice/provenance of Suit

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Paul Shiboko

1st Claimant

Musa Nasoro

2nd Claimant

Emily Ligami

3rd Claimant

Patrick Chungani – Executive Secretary (KNUT) Kakamega East Branch & 3 others

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment and Labour Relations Cause / Ruling on Stay of Proceedings

  1. 1 Whether the court should stay proceedings in light of a parallel case allegedly filed before the Kakamega Chief Magistrate's Court.
  2. 2 Whether the provenance and priority of the present suit should be determined before the matter proceeds.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that there was evidence of a related matter already filed before the Kakamega Chief Magistrate's Court and, relying on its supervisory powers over employment and labour relations matters, stayed the proceedings in this cause pending determination of the provenance of this suit.

Court Disposition

Proceedings stayed pending determination of the provenance of the suit.

Orders

  • Stay of proceedings granted.
  • File to be forwarded to the Registry on 22nd June 2026.