[2023] KEELRC 2017 (KLR)

[2023] KEELRC 2017 (KLR)

The court found that the claimant was employed during the relevant period, suffered pay cuts, and rendered service qualifying her for the bonus. The respondent's internal memo created a legitimate expectation for employees in the claimant's position to receive the bonus. The refusal to pay the bonus to the claimant,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEELRC 2017 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Victoria Anne Njeri Shigoli; Respondent: Riara Group Of Schools Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause E433 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Employment Claim / Judgment
Outcome
judgment for the claimant
Judges
B Ongaya
Legal Topics
Bonus Entitlement, Discrimination in Employment, Employment Contracts, Remedies for Unpaid Dues
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Bonus Entitlement Discrimination in Employment Employment Contracts Remedies for Unpaid Dues

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Victoria Anne Njeri Shigoli

Applicant

Riara Group Of Schools Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Claim / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the claimant was entitled to a bonus pay-out for the period worked in 2020 and 2021.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent's refusal to pay the bonus was discriminatory and contrary to the Employment Act, 2007.
  3. 3 Whether the bonus was a contractual entitlement or a discretionary benefit.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the claimant was employed during the relevant period, suffered pay cuts, and rendered service qualifying her for the bonus. The respondent's internal memo created a legitimate expectation for employees in the claimant's position to receive the bonus. The refusal to pay the bonus to the claimant, while paying others in similar circumstances, amounted to discrimination contrary to section 5 of the Employment Act, 2007. The court held that the bonus, though described as discretionary, could not be withheld in a discriminatory manner. The claimant was therefore entitled to the bonus pay-out equivalent to two months' salary, and the respondent was ordered to pay the amount...

Court Disposition

judgment for the claimant

Orders

  • The respondent to pay the claimant Kshs 933,100.00 by October 1, 2023, failing which interest is payable at court rates from January 1, 2022 until full payment.
  • The respondent to pay the claimant's costs of the suit.