[2019] KEHC 12230 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 12230 (KLR)

The court found that the failure to file the affidavit of service was a mistake by counsel for the defendant, not the defendant itself. The affidavit of service, once produced, demonstrated that the amended defence and counterclaim had indeed been served on the plaintiff's advocates prior to the hearing date. The...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEHC 12230 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Shirin Jiwa; Defendant: The Ismailia Economic Development Society Limited
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Case 313 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Dismissal of Counterclaim
Outcome
Application allowed; previous dismissal order set aside; counterclaim reinstated.
Legal Topics
Review of Orders, Setting Aside Dismissal, Affidavit of Service, Reinstatement of Pleadings
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Review of Orders Setting Aside Dismissal Affidavit of Service Reinstatement of Pleadings

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Shirin Jiwa

Plaintiff

The Ismailia Economic Development Society Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Case / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Dismissal of Counterclaim

  1. 1 Whether the court should review and set aside its order dismissing the defendant's counterclaim due to non-filing of affidavit of service.
  2. 2 Whether failure by counsel to file the affidavit of service should be visited upon the client.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the failure to file the affidavit of service was a mistake by counsel for the defendant, not the defendant itself. The affidavit of service, once produced, demonstrated that the amended defence and counterclaim had indeed been served on the plaintiff's advocates prior to the hearing date. The court held that such a procedural mistake should not prejudice the defendant's right to have its counterclaim heard on the merits. Consequently, the court exercised its discretion to review and set aside its earlier order dismissing the counterclaim and reinstated the same for hearing.

Court Disposition

Application allowed; previous dismissal order set aside; counterclaim reinstated.

Orders

  • The orders of 7th December 2018 dismissing the defendant's counterclaim are set aside.
  • The defendant's amended counterclaim dated 9th February 2016 is reinstated for hearing.