[2023] KECPT 457 (KLR)

[2023] KECPT 457 (KLR)

The Tribunal found that the applicant was properly served with the statement of claim, summons to enter appearance, and ex-parte judgment, making the judgment regular. The applicant acknowledged service but failed to act promptly or contact his advocate. The Tribunal reviewed the grounds and draft defence submitted...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KECPT 457 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Shoppers Sacco Society Ltd; Respondent: Charles Kisilu
Court
Cooperative Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Tribunal Case E251 (433) of 2021
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Ex Parte Judgment
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
BM Kimemia, J. Mwatsama, B Sawe, F Lotuiya, P. Gichuki, M Chesikaw, PO Aol
Legal Topics
Setting Aside Ex Parte Judgment, Regular Vs Irregular Judgment, Service of Process
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Setting Aside Ex Parte Judgment Regular Vs Irregular Judgment Service of Process

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Shoppers Sacco Society Ltd

Applicant

Charles Kisilu

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Ex Parte Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the ex-parte judgment entered on January 31, 2022 should be set aside.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant was properly served with the statement of claim and summons to enter appearance.
  3. 3 Whether the draft defence raises any triable issues warranting the setting aside of the summary judgment.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the applicant was properly served with the statement of claim, summons to enter appearance, and ex-parte judgment, making the judgment regular. The applicant acknowledged service but failed to act promptly or contact his advocate. The Tribunal reviewed the grounds and draft defence submitted by the applicant and determined that no triable issues were raised to warrant setting aside the summary judgment. Accordingly, the Tribunal exercised its discretion to dismiss the application, finding it without merit and awarding costs to the claimant.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application dated July 22, 2022 is dismissed.
  • Costs awarded to the claimant.