[2024] KEELC 4429 (KLR)

[2024] KEELC 4429 (KLR)

The court found that the application dated 17th April, 2024 was unnecessary and incompetent because eviction orders had already been granted on 9th November, 2023, and the court had become functus officio regarding the matter. The attempt to stay the eviction orders was previously dismissed, and the issues raised in...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEELC 4429 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: David Kapolonto Shundur; Defendant: Rigogo Chonjo Company Ltd; Defendant: Joseph Itur; Defendant: Samuel Kiplangat; Defendant: Josphat Ngetich
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Kericho
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 9 of 1993
Procedural Posture
Post Judgment Application / Ruling on Application to Enforce Eviction and Security Orders
Outcome
application struck out
Judges
LA Omollo
Legal Topics
Eviction Orders, Res Judicata, Functus Officio, Enforcement of Judgments
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Eviction Orders Res Judicata Functus Officio Enforcement of Judgments

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

David Kapolonto Shundur

Plaintiff

Rigogo Chonjo Company Ltd

Defendant

Joseph Itur

Defendant

Samuel Kiplangat

Defendant

Josphat Ngetich

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Post Judgment Application / Ruling on Application to Enforce Eviction and Security Orders

  1. 1 Whether the application dated 17th April, 2024 seeking enforcement of eviction and security orders is res judicata.
  2. 2 Whether the court is functus officio in relation to the eviction orders previously granted.
  3. 3 Whether the current application is necessary given prior orders.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the application dated 17th April, 2024 was unnecessary and incompetent because eviction orders had already been granted on 9th November, 2023, and the court had become functus officio regarding the matter. The attempt to stay the eviction orders was previously dismissed, and the issues raised in the current application had already been conclusively determined. Accordingly, the application was struck out as it was res judicata and the court lacked jurisdiction to entertain it further.

Court Disposition

application struck out

Orders

  • The application dated 17th April, 2024 is struck out.