[2015] KEELC 382 (KLR)

[2015] KEELC 382 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiff, as a confirmed administratrix and beneficiary of her late father’s estate, was entitled to an equal share of the suit land as per the certificate of confirmation of grant. The defendants’ refusal to allow surveyors to demarcate the land and their continued occupation and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] KEELC 382 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Sibilina Kurgat; Defendant: Augustine Kurgat; Defendant: John Kibiwott Maiyo
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Eldoret
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 199 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Land and Environment Case / Judgment
Outcome
judgment for the plaintiff
Legal Topics
Succession and Administration, Land Partition, Injunctive Relief, Land Ownership Disputes
Source Language
en
Land and Property Succession and Administration Land Partition Injunctive Relief Land Ownership Disputes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sibilina Kurgat

Plaintiff

Augustine Kurgat

Defendant

John Kibiwott Maiyo

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Land and Environment Case / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with her portion of land.
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to an order compelling the defendants to allow surveyors to demarcate and place beacons on the boundaries of the suit land.
  3. 3 Whether the defendants have unlawfully denied the plaintiff use and enjoyment of her share of the land.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff, as a confirmed administratrix and beneficiary of her late father’s estate, was entitled to an equal share of the suit land as per the certificate of confirmation of grant. The defendants’ refusal to allow surveyors to demarcate the land and their continued occupation and interference with the plaintiff’s portion constituted unlawful denial of her rights. The court held that the plaintiff had proved her case on a balance of probabilities and was entitled to the reliefs sought, including permanent injunctions restraining the defendants from interfering with her portion, and orders compelling the defendants to allow surveyors to demarcate and place beacons...

Court Disposition

judgment for the plaintiff

Orders

  • A permanent injunction restraining the defendants, their agents or servants from entering, ploughing, constructing on, developing or dealing with the plaintiff's area of approximately 4.9 acres of TEMBELIO/ELGEYO BORDER BLOCK 5 (EX-TOOLEY)/203.
  • A permanent injunction restraining the defendants, their agents or servants from interfering with the plaintiff's use and enjoyment of her portion of approximately 4.9 acres of the said parcel.