[2018] KEELC 1443 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant failed to demonstrate that Mercia Muliro held the property as proprietor and not merely as an administrator or trustee of the estate of the late Henry Pius Masinde Muliro. Since Mercia Muliro was only an administrator, and upon her demise, a new administrator must be properly...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEELC 1443 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Siboti Farmers Co-operative Society Limited; Respondent: Hon. Attorney General; Respondent: The Chief Land Registrar; Respondent: Mercia Muliro; Respondent: Wesakulila Farm Limited; Respondent: Mukasa Mwambu Muliro
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Kitale
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- ? 14 of 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Substitution and Amendment Application
- Outcome
- application dismissed with costs
- Judges
- FM Njoroge
- Legal Topics
- Substitution of Parties, Letters of Administration, Abatement of Suit, Estate Administration
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Siboti Farmers Co-operative Society Limited
Applicant
Hon. Attorney General
Respondent
The Chief Land Registrar
Respondent
Mercia Muliro
Respondent
Wesakulila Farm Limited
Respondent
Mukasa Mwambu Muliro
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Substitution and Amendment Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mukasa Mwambu Muliro should be substituted as the 3rd defendant in place of the deceased Mercia Muliro.
- 2 Whether the applicant has demonstrated that Mercia Muliro held the property as proprietor and not merely as administrator or trustee.
- 3 Whether the suit has abated due to the death of the administrator and lack of proper substitution.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant failed to demonstrate that Mercia Muliro held the property as proprietor and not merely as an administrator or trustee of the estate of the late Henry Pius Masinde Muliro. Since Mercia Muliro was only an administrator, and upon her demise, a new administrator must be properly appointed in her place before any further proceedings regarding the estate can be undertaken. The citation proceedings were directed at the estate of Mercia Muliro, not the estate of Henry Pius Masinde Muliro, and the applicant did not provide evidence that the property devolved to Mercia Muliro as proprietor. Therefore, the application for substitution and amendment lacked merit...
Court Disposition
application dismissed with costs
Orders
- The application dated 12/6/2018 is dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
35 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT KITALE
ELC. PET NO. 14 OF 2013
SIBOTI FARMERS CO-OPERATIVE
SOCIETY LIMITED............................PETITIONER/APPLICANT
VERSUS
HON. ATTORNEY GENERAL..........................1ST RESPONDENT
THE CHIEF LAND REGISTRAR....................2ND RESPONDENT
MERCIA MULIRO.............................................3RD RESPONDENT
WESAKULILA FARM LIMITED....................4TH RESPONDENT
AND
MUKASA MWAMBU MULIRO..............................RESPONDENT
R U L I N G
1. The Notice of Motion dated 12/6/2018 seeks that the court be pleased to substitute the deceased administrator herein (Mercia Muliro) with Mukasa Mwambu Muliro who has taken Letters of Administration in respect of the deceased administratrix. It further sought leave be granted to plaintiff to amend the plaint to reflect the name of Mukasa Mwambu Muliro as the 3rd defendant herein and that costs of this application be in the cause.
2. The applicant’s grounds for the application are that the 3rd defendant herein died on the 24th September, 2015; that the Letters of Administration in respect of Mercia Muliro (deceased administrator) were issued to Mukasa Mwambu Muliro on the 6th June, 2018; that the suit between the deceased administrator and the plaintiff herein is still pending before this court and hence need for substitution to allow the same to proceed for hearing and determination and that there will be need to amend the petition to reflect the name of Mukasa Mwambu Muliro as the 3rd defendant.
3. The application is supported by the affidavit of Timothy Masika Wanyama the current chairman of the petitioner herein sworn on 12th June, 2018.
4. In reply to the application the respondent (Mukasa Mwambu Muliro) filed a replying affidavit sworn on 19/6/2018 and filed in court on the same date. He avers that Mercia Muliro the administrator of the estate of the late Henry Pius Masinde Muliro died before completion of the administration of the estate, that she had been sued in her capacity as the administrator to that estate, and that the respondent is therefore not the proper person to be enjoined as he allegedly has no capacity to represent the estate of the late Henry Pius Masinde Muliro as he has not been appointed to so act. He also terms the suit as abated.
5. The defendant filed supplementary affidavit sworn on 13/7//2018 by one Timothy Masika Wanyama and filed on 16/7/2018. In that affidavit he avers that in the citation proceedings in P&A Cause No 12 of 2016, the court directed the respondent to take up and institute the appropriate proceedings seeking grant of letters of administration over the estate of Mercia Muliro within 30 days of 18/5/2017.
6. The petitioner filed his submissions on 30/7/2018. I have perused through the court record in this matter and found no submissions filed on behalf of the respondent.
7. It would appear from the title to that succession cause that it was the main cause in which Mercia Muliro has sought and obtained a Grant in respect of the estate of the late Henry Pius Masinde Muliro. Why no citation was made in respect of the late Mercia Muliro instead of the late Henry Pius Masinde Muliro is not clear.
8. I am of the view that since the property in the land was originally owned by the deceased, the late Henry Pius Masinde Muliro, it is incumbent upon the applicant to demonstrate that the land and devolved substantially to Mercia Muliro as proprietor and not as a trustee or administrator in order for the application herein to have merit.
9. The applicant has not done so. Without that evidence, the position I take is that Mercia Muliro was only an administrator of the estate of the late Henry Pius Masinde Muliro and upon her demise another administrator has to be appointed in the proper manner in her place before any further distribution of the estate of the late Henry Pius Masinde Muliro can be undertaken. Since the citation was sought against the respondent in respect of Mercia Muliro’s estate, I find that the instant application has no merit and I hereby dismiss it with costs.
Dated, signed and delivered at Kitale on this 25th day of September, 2018.
MWANGI NJOROGE
JUDGE
25/9/2018
Coram: Before Hon. Mwangi Njoroge, Judge
Court Assistant - Picoty
N/A for the plaintiff
N/A for the defendant
COURT
Ruling read in open court.
MWANGI NJOROGE
JUDGE
25/9/2018