[2022] KECA 1218 (KLR)

[2022] KECA 1218 (KLR)

The court found that the applicants, as duly appointed personal representatives of the deceased Raghbir Singh Sidhu, had provided uncontested evidence of his death and their authority to act. The application for substitution was brought within the statutory period of one year from the date of death, as required by...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KECA 1218 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Davinder Kaur Sidhu; Applicant: Sanjeev Patel; Respondent: Geoffrey Tenai; Respondent: Raghbir Singh Sidhu; Respondent: Kipkemboi Arap Koskei; Respondent: Commissioner of Lands; Respondent: The County Land Registrar; Respondent: National Land Commission; Respondent: The Attorney General
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Application 106 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Substitution of Party
Outcome
Application for substitution allowed.
Judges
F Tuiyott
Legal Topics
Party Substitution, Death of Party, Appeal Procedure, Probate and Administration
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Party Substitution Death of Party Appeal Procedure Probate and Administration

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Davinder Kaur Sidhu

Applicant

Sanjeev Patel

Applicant

Geoffrey Tenai

Respondent

Raghbir Singh Sidhu

Respondent

Kipkemboi Arap Koskei

Respondent

Commissioner of Lands

Respondent

The County Land Registrar

Respondent

National Land Commission

Respondent

The Attorney General

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Substitution of Party

  1. 1 Whether the applicants should be substituted as parties in place of the deceased respondent, Raghbir Singh Sidhu.
  2. 2 Whether the application for substitution was brought within the prescribed time to prevent abatement of the appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants, as duly appointed personal representatives of the deceased Raghbir Singh Sidhu, had provided uncontested evidence of his death and their authority to act. The application for substitution was brought within the statutory period of one year from the date of death, as required by the Court of Appeal Rules. No opposition was filed by any party. Therefore, the requirements for substitution were satisfied, the appeal had not abated, and the application was merited. The court allowed the substitution without making any order as to costs.

Court Disposition

Application for substitution allowed.

Orders

  • Davinder Kaur Sidhu and Sanjeev Patel are substituted as parties in place of the deceased Raghbir Singh Sidhu in the appeal.
  • No order as to costs.