[2017] KEELC 2620 (KLR)
The court found that the Petitioner had established a prima facie case that its constitutional rights to property and protection from harassment were threatened by the actions of the Respondents. The Respondents failed to respond or justify their conduct. In the interest of justice, and to prevent further potential...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] KEELC 2620 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Sigma Phi Investments Limited; Respondent: Inspector General of the National Police Service; Respondent: Deputy Inspector General of the Administration Police Service
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 18 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Conservatory Orders
- Outcome
- Application for conservatory orders granted.
- Judges
- AK Bor
- Legal Topics
- Conservatory Orders, Right to Property, Police Powers, Harassment and Intimidation, Ownership Disputes
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sigma Phi Investments Limited
Applicant
Inspector General of the National Police Service
Respondent
Deputy Inspector General of the Administration Police Service
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Conservatory Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the actions of the Respondents amounted to a violation of the Petitioner's constitutional rights to property and protection from harassment.
- 2 Whether the Petitioner is entitled to conservatory orders restraining the Respondents from interfering with its use and development of the Suit Property.
- 3 Whether the Respondents should be compelled to disclose the identity of the complainant and the nature of the complaint regarding the Suit Property.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the Petitioner had established a prima facie case that its constitutional rights to property and protection from harassment were threatened by the actions of the Respondents. The Respondents failed to respond or justify their conduct. In the interest of justice, and to prevent further potential violation of the Petitioner's rights, the court granted the conservatory orders sought in prayers 4, 5, and 6 of the application dated 4th May 2017, restraining the Respondents from interfering with the Petitioner's use and development of the Suit Property and compelling disclosure of the complainant's identity and complaint.
Court Disposition
Application for conservatory orders granted.
Orders
- Respondents, their officers, agents, servants or employees are restrained from threatening, intimidating, harassing, interfering, undermining, restricting and disturbing the Petitioner's quiet and peaceful use, ownership, possession, development and construction of L. R. No.209/11434 pending hearing and...
- Respondents are ordered to disclose to the Petitioner and the court the full names of the complainant and the nature of their complaint over the Suit Property within 30 days.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
29 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT NAIROBI
E.L.C. PETITION NO. 18 OF 2017
IN THE MATTER OF THE CONTRAVENTION OF THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS
UNDER ARTICLES 2 (5) & (6), 28, 31, 40, 258 AND 260 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF KENYA, 2010
AND
THE CONSTITUTION OF KENYA (PROTECTION OF RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS) PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE RULES, 2013
AND
SECTION 13 OF THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT ACT, 2011
AND
BETWEEN
SIGMA PHI INVESTMENTS LIMITED………....…......................….PETITIONER
VERSUS
THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF THE
NATIONAL POLICE SERVICE……….…..………………….....1ST RESPONDENT
THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL
OF THE ADMINISTRATION POLICE SERVICE…......…….…2ND RESPONDENT
RULING
The Petitioner filed the application dated 4th May 2017 seeking conservatory orders to restrain the Respondents, their officers, complainants, agents, servants or employees from threatening, intimidating, harassing, interfering, undermining, restricting and disturbing the Petitioner’s quiet and peaceful use, ownership, possession, development and construction of L. R. No.209/11434 situated in Masaai Road off Mombasa Road within Nairobi County (“the Suit Property”). The Petitioner seeks these orders pending hearing and determination of its petition. It seeks a further order for the Respondents to reveal or disclose to it and this honourable court the full names of the complainant and the nature of their complaint over the Suit Property within 30 days.
The application is supported by the affidavit of Catherine Wangari, a Manager of the Petitioner. She depones that the Petitioner which is a limited liability company is the lawful owner of the Suit Property. It commenced construction and development of the Suit Property. On 25th April, 2017 at around 4. 00 p.m., a land rover full of administration police officers arrived at the Suit Property while the Petitioner’s contractor Juja Blocks Ltd was carrying out construction and development activities on the Suit Property. The armed Administration Police officers demanded access to the Suit Property ostensibly to conduct a search. They did not display a court order or identify themselves. They claimed that there was an ownership dispute and that the complainant had reported a dispute to them. These officers demanded that the Petitioner and its agents immediately stop construction and present themselves to the Deputy County Commissioner of Police at Wilson Airport police station and to present the documents of ownership of the Suit Property. The Petitioner claims that the actions of the Respondent were unlawful, unconstitutional and amounted to harassment and intimidation of the Petitioner, its servants, agents and employees. The Petitioner expressed fear that its agents may be harmed, injured or mortally wounded if the crowd of administration police officers were to return and follow up on their threats. They therefore, seek conservatory orders.
This court granted interim conservatory orders on 11th May 2017 and directed that the Respondents were to be served for inter partes hearing on 21st June 2017. The Respondents were served but did not file any papers.
The court has considered the application and is of the view that it would be in the interest of justice to grant prayers 4, 5 and 6 of the application dated 4th May, 2017.
Dated and delivered at Nairobi on 29th June 2017.
K. BOR
JUDGE
In the presence of: -
Ms. Wangui holding brief for Wairoto for the Applicant
No appearance for the Respondents
Mr. V. Owuor- Court Assistant