[2021] KEELRC 2412 (KLR)

[2021] KEELRC 2412 (KLR)

The court found that the claim was filed well outside the three-year limitation period mandated by section 90 of the Employment Act. The claimant was dismissed on 8th November 2012, and the claim was not filed until 5th August 2020. The court emphasized that the limitation period is mandatory and the court has no...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEELRC 2412 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Silas K. Tanui; Respondent: Teachers Service Commission (TSC)
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Eldoret
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 30 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Preliminary Objection / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Outcome
claim struck out as statute barred
Legal Topics
Limitation Periods, Unlawful Dismissal, Employment Contracts
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Limitation Periods Unlawful Dismissal Employment Contracts

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Silas K. Tanui

Applicant

Teachers Service Commission (TSC)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Preliminary Objection / Ruling on Preliminary Objection

  1. 1 Whether the claim is statute barred under section 90 of the Employment Act.
  2. 2 Whether the court has discretion to extend the limitation period set by statute.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the claim was filed well outside the three-year limitation period mandated by section 90 of the Employment Act. The claimant was dismissed on 8th November 2012, and the claim was not filed until 5th August 2020. The court emphasized that the limitation period is mandatory and the court has no discretion to extend it. Since the claimant did not provide any explanation for the delay or any legal basis for extension, the suit was held to be statute barred and was struck out with costs.

Court Disposition

claim struck out as statute barred

Orders

  • The suit is struck out with costs to the respondent.