[2014] KEHC 2464 (KLR)
The court found that the application was unopposed and that the refusal of the respondents to sign the necessary documents was impeding the implementation of a consent order previously adopted by the court. The official search confirmed the registration status contrary to the 2nd plaintiff's assertions. To give...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2014] KEHC 2464 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Silas Kirema M'Ibiiri; Plaintiff: Esther Mwengwa M'Ibiiri; Plaintiff: Prischilla Kaguri M'Ibiiri; Defendant: Peter Munyi M'Ibiiri; Defendant: Jeremiah Mugambi Thuranira; Defendant: Dominic Kithera Memeu; Defendant: David Mwirigi Kinoti; Defendant: Timothy Murithi Kinoti; Defendant: Esther Karimi
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Meru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Case 72 of 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Execution of Consent Order Regarding Land Subdivision and Transfer
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Judges
- FM Njoroge
- Legal Topics
- Trusts in Land, Subdivision of Land, Transfer of Land, Implementation of Court Orders
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Silas Kirema M'Ibiiri
Plaintiff
Esther Mwengwa M'Ibiiri
Plaintiff
Prischilla Kaguri M'Ibiiri
Plaintiff
Peter Munyi M'Ibiiri
Defendant
Jeremiah Mugambi Thuranira
Defendant
Dominic Kithera Memeu
Defendant
David Mwirigi Kinoti
Defendant
Timothy Murithi Kinoti
Defendant
Esther Karimi
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Execution of Consent Order Regarding Land Subdivision and Transfer
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Deputy Registrar should be authorized to sign requisite documents for subdivision and transfer of land parcel KIANJAI/MITUNTU/131 on behalf of the respondents.
- 2 Whether the Land Registrar should dispense with the original title deed to facilitate implementation of the court order.
- 3 Whether costs should be awarded to the applicant.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the application was unopposed and that the refusal of the respondents to sign the necessary documents was impeding the implementation of a consent order previously adopted by the court. The official search confirmed the registration status contrary to the 2nd plaintiff's assertions. To give effect to the consent order and ensure the beneficiaries receive their entitlements, the court authorized the Deputy Registrar to sign all requisite documents for subdivision and transfer of the land. The court further ordered the Land Registrar to dispense with the original title deed to facilitate the process. Costs were awarded to the applicant as the application was not opposed...
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- The Deputy Registrar is authorized to sign all requisite documents on behalf of the respondents to have land parcel KIANJAI/MITUNTU/131 subdivided and transferred to all beneficiaries.
- The Land Registrar is ordered to dispense with the original title deed to parcel KIANJAI/MITUNTU/131 to implement the court order.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
37 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU
HCC NO. 72 OF 2008(OS)
IN THE MATTER OF M'IBIIRI KARUNYA – DECEASED
AND
IN THE MATTER OF LAND PARCEL NUMBER KIANJAI MITUNTU/131
BETWEEN
SILAS KIREMA M'IBIIRI.........................................................................................1ST PLAINTIFF
ESTHER MWENGWA M'IBIIRI..............................................................................2ND PLAINTIFF
PRISCHILLA KAGURI M'IBIIRI............................................................................3RD PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
PETER MUNYI M'IBIIRI.......................................................................................1ST DEFENDANT
JEREMIAH MUGAMBI THURANIRA...............................................................2ND DEFENDANT
DOMINIC KITHERA MEMEU.............................................................................3RD DEFENDANT
DAVID MWIRIGI KINOTI...................................................................................4TH DEFENDANT
TIMOTHY MURITHI KINOTI.............................................................................5TH DEFENDANT
ESTHER KARIMI...................................................................................................6TH DEFENDANT
R U L I N G
This application is dated 26. 9.2013. It seeks orders that:
(a) The Deputy Registrar be authorized by this Hon. Court to sign all the requisite documents on behalf of the respondents to have the land parcel NO.KIANJAI/MITUNTU/131 sub-divided and transferred to all the beneficiaries.
(b) The Court do make further orders as may meet the ends of justice in this matter.
(c) Costs be provided for.
The application is based on the following grounds:
(i) The land, the subject of this cause is registered in the names of the plaintiffs and the defendant, to hold in trust for themselves and other beneficiaries.
(ii)The respondents/plaintiffs have refused to sign sub-division and transfer documents to effect transfer.
(iii)The respondents are also entitled to a portion of the said land.
(iv)The applicant cannot develop his portion effectively without title to the same.
On 6. 4.2014 the respondent had prayed, and was granted, 21 days to respond to the application. When the application came up for interpartes hearing on 8. 7.2014, the respondent had not opposed the application. The 2nd plaintiff, without batting an eyelid, told the Court that she was not one of the registered owners of the suit land. She said that her advocate had refused to come to Court as he had not been paid. The certificate of official search said otherwise. As at 4th July, 2013, the suit land was registered in the names of Esther Mwengwa Ibiiri and Silas Kirema Ibiiri.
This application is intended to facilitate the implementation of a consent which was adopted as an order of this court. As it is not opposed, it is allowed. I award costs to the applicant.
As for prayer (b) in the application, I order that the Land Registrar should dispense with the original title deed to parcel No. KIANJAI/MITUNTU/131 so that the order of this Court can be implemented.
It is so ordered.
Delivered in Open Court at Meru this 8th day of July, 2014 in the presence of :
Cc. Lilian
Miss E. G. Mwangi for Applicant
Esther Mwengwa M'Ibiiri – 2nd Plaintiff
P. M. NJOROGE
JUDGE