[1992] KEHC 121 (KLR)
The court found that the plaintiff sustained minor injuries (contusions to the right thigh and knee) during the course of his employment with the defendant, for which the defendant admitted liability. In assessing damages, the court considered comparable cases and the effect of inflation. The injuries were deemed...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1992] KEHC 121 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Silobo; Defendant: Bamburi Portland Cement Co. Ltd
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Mombasa
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Case 214 of 1988
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Case / Judgment
- Outcome
- judgment for the plaintiff
- Legal Topics
- Workplace Injury, Employer Liability, Assessment of Damages
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Silobo
Plaintiff
Bamburi Portland Cement Co. Ltd
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant is liable for the injuries sustained by the plaintiff during the workplace accident on 11th April, 1985.
- 2 What is the appropriate quantum of damages for the injuries suffered by the plaintiff.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the plaintiff sustained minor injuries (contusions to the right thigh and knee) during the course of his employment with the defendant, for which the defendant admitted liability. In assessing damages, the court considered comparable cases and the effect of inflation. The injuries were deemed closer in severity to those in Buishi Hamisi Faki v Abdi Duda, where Shs.30,000/- was awarded in 1989. Adjusting for inflation, the court awarded Shs.40,000/- as general damages. Special damages of Shs.3,000/- were also awarded as pleaded and proved. The plaintiff was entitled to interest on special damages from the date of filing suit and on general damages from the date of...
Court Disposition
judgment for the plaintiff
Orders
- Plaintiff awarded special damages of Shs.3,000/- with interest at court rates from the date of filing suit.
- Plaintiff awarded general damages of Shs.40,000/- with interest at court rates from the date of judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
13 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
Silobo v Bamburi Portland Cement Co. Ltd
High Court, at Mombasa February 27, 1992
Omolo J
Civil Case No. 214 of 1988
February 27, 1992,Omolo Jdelivered the following Judgment.
This unfortunate Plaintiff had an accident at his place of work on the 11th April, 1985. During the accident, bricks fell on his leg and on his thigh and it is now agreed that as a result of the accident the only injuries sustained by the Plaintiff were constusions on the right thigh and knee (see Mr. Patel’s medical report produced as Exhibit 4). The Plaintiff, at the time of the accident, was an employee of the Defendant Bamburi Portland Cement Co. Ltd. It would appear that sometime in 1980, the Plaintiff was involved in another accident when he was electrocuted at his place of work. The Plaintiff apparently made no complaint about the 1980 accident and continued with his work normally until the accident of 1985. When Mr. Patel saw him on 7th June, 1991, the Plaintiff complained about back pain. On the evidence available, it was not possible to determine whether the back pain is due to the 1980 or the 1985 accident and in the end the Plaintiff conceded that the injuries sustained in 1985 were only the contusions to the thigh and the knee. TheDefendant promptly admitted liability for these injuries.
Those injuries are of a minor nature. I was referred to two cases, one Mr. Jiwaji for the Plaintiff, and another one by Mr. Khanna for the Defendant. Mr. Jiwaji referred me to the Mombasa case of Buishi Hamisi Faki v Abdi Duda,H.C.C.C No. 243 of 1984 (unreported) Faki was a 39 year old housewife and she suffered lacerations on both elbows, right heel and contusion on both laps (thighs). The injuries healed leaving no lasting effects. Mr. Justice Bosire awarded to her Shs.30,000/- as general damages on the 21st November, 1989. Mr. Khanna thought that her injuries were of a graver nature than those of the present plaintiff, and he in turn referred me to the Nairobi case of Nancy W. Karriuki v Francis Mwangi & Another, H.C.C.C. No. 2982 of 1986 (unreported). Nancy suffered bruises on the right side of the chest, bruises on the right side of the pelvis and laceration of the chest. The late Mr. Justice Rauf awarded to her Shs.7,000/- as general damages on the 29th June, 1987. Mr. Khanna submitted that these injuries are nearer to those suffered by the present plaintiff, but that taking into account the question in inflation, I should double the award and give the plaintiff Shs.15,000/-. I personally think that the injuries suffered by the plaintiff while they are clearly of a minor nature, are nearer to those of Mr. Jiwaji’s case thanMr. Khanna’s case. Mr. Justice Bosire awarded Shs.30,000/- in 1989 and taking into account the question of inflation, I now award to the Plaintiff Shs.40,000/- as general damages for the injuries he suffered on the 11th April, 1985.
Accordingly, I now enter judgment for the Plaintiff against the Defendant as follows:-
1. Special Damages – Shs.3,000/- with interest thereon at court rates with effect from the date when the suit was filed;
2. General Damages – Shs.40,000/- with interest thereon at court rates with effect from the date of this judgment.
3. Costs of the suit to the plaintiff.
Those shall be the order of the court.