[2007] KEHC 2597 (KLR)
The court found that the plaintiff was the registered owner of the entire suit property as evidenced by the title deed produced in court. The defendant's defence was a general denial and unsupported by evidence, as he failed to attend the trial or provide proof of his alleged ownership. The court held that the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2007] KEHC 2597 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Simion Kipkosgei Limo; Defendant: Joseph Gateri Mwangi
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Eldoret
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Suit 102 of 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Suit / Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment for the plaintiff.
- Legal Topics
- Trespass to Land, Ownership Disputes, Permanent Injunction, Eviction Orders
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Simion Kipkosgei Limo
Plaintiff
Joseph Gateri Mwangi
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff is the registered owner of the suit property.
- 2 Whether the defendant is a trespasser on the suit property.
- 3 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to a permanent injunction and eviction order against the defendant.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the plaintiff was the registered owner of the entire suit property as evidenced by the title deed produced in court. The defendant's defence was a general denial and unsupported by evidence, as he failed to attend the trial or provide proof of his alleged ownership. The court held that the defendant's actions constituted trespass and that the plaintiff was entitled to the reliefs sought. Judgment was entered for the plaintiff, granting a permanent injunction and eviction order against the defendant, together with costs.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the plaintiff.
Orders
- A permanent injunction restraining the defendant, his agents and/or servants from trespassing into, occupying, interfering with the quiet enjoyment of the plaintiff’s proprietary interests, interfering with the tenants, or in any way dealing with the suit property.
- An eviction order against the defendant from the suit property.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
18 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT ELDORET
Civil Suit 102 of 2003
SIMION KIPKOSGEI LIMO ……………..…………………… PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
JOSEPH GATERI MWANGI ……………..……………… DEFENDANT
JUDGEMENT
The Plaintiff filed this suit on 5th December, 2003 in which he sought the following orders against the Defendant;-
(i) A permanent injunction to prevent the Defendant, his agents and or servants from trespassing into, occupying, interfering with the quiet enjoyment of the Plaintiff’s proprietory interests and/or interfering with the tenants on the suit property and or in anyway dealing with the suit property.
(ii) An eviction order.
(iii) Costs of the suit.
The Plaintiff claimed that he was the registered owner of the suit property, land parcel number Eldoret Municipality/Block 21/Kingongo/1210. He alleged that the Defendant had entered into and trespassed upon the Plaintiff’s land and interfered with his tenants.
In his Defence the Defendant filed a defence which was a general denial. However, he claimed that he was the legal owner of a portion of the suit property measuring 50 x 100 feet and therefore he could not be a trespasser on his own land.
The Defendant and his Counsel did not attend Court at the trial. The Defendant’s Counsel had been served with a hearing notice and he sent another Counsel to apply for adjournment on his behalf. The application was rejected and the trial proceeded.
The Plaintiff testified and he produced in Court title deed to the suit property. This Court hereby finds that the plaintiff is the registered owner of the suit property with effect from 5th September, 2003. The Defendant’s defence is weak and a general denial. It is difficult to comprehend how the Defendant could own a portion of the suit property yet the entire land was registered by the Plaintiff. The Defendant did not attend Court for the trial despite knowledge of the hearing date.
On a balance of probability, I do hereby find that the Defendant is a trespasser on the suit property and that he has also disobeyed Orders of this Court. I do hereby enter judgement for the Plaintiff and grant the orders of permanent injunction and eviction order as prayed in prayers (i) and (ii). The Plaintiff shall be paid costs of the suit by the Defendant.
DATED AND DELIVERED AT ELDORET ON THIS 5TH DAY OF JUNE, 2007.
M. K. IBRAHIM
JUDGE