https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2026/1890

https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2026/1890

The court found that the Applicant had a valid unpaid decree and subsequent appellate orders against government entities, and because service was proper and no opposition was filed, the application was merited. It therefore ordered issuance of a certificate of order against the Government to facilitate satisfaction...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2026] KEELRC 1890 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant/applicant: Tome Francis Simiyu; 1st Respondent: Bungoma County Assembly Service Board; 2nd Respondent: Speaker County Assembly of Bungoma; 3rd Respondent: The Clerk County Assembly of Bungoma
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause E011 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Employment and Labour Relations Court Ruling on Application for Certificate of Order Against the Government / Post Judgment Enforcement Application
Outcome
Application allowed
Judges
["DN Nderitu"]
Legal Topics
Certificate of Order Against the Government, Enforcement of Monetary Awards Against Government Entities, Costs and Taxation, Interest on Decretal Sum, Effect of Appellate Judgment on Trial Court Decree
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Law Civil Procedure Judicial Review/enforcement of Decrees Public Law Certificate of Order Against the Government Enforcement of Monetary Awards Against Government Entities Costs and Taxation Interest on Decretal Sum +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Tome Francis Simiyu

Claimant/applicant

Bungoma County Assembly Service Board

1st Respondent

Speaker County Assembly of Bungoma

2nd Respondent

The Clerk County Assembly of Bungoma

3rd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment and Labour Relations Court Ruling on Application for Certificate of Order Against the Government / Post Judgment Enforcement Application

  1. 1 Whether the Applicant was entitled to issuance of a certificate of order against the Government under section 21 of the Government Proceedings Act.
  2. 2 Whether the Respondents, as government entities, could be compelled to satisfy the judgment sums through the certificate procedure.
  3. 3 Whether the outstanding costs of the trial court proceedings should be included in the certificate before taxation.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Applicant had a valid unpaid decree and subsequent appellate orders against government entities, and because service was proper and no opposition was filed, the application was merited. It therefore ordered issuance of a certificate of order against the Government to facilitate satisfaction of the judgments, while leaving unassessed trial court costs to be taxed or agreed separately.

Court Disposition

Application allowed

Orders

  • A certificate of order against the Government shall issue against the Respondents in terms of the judgment of the trial court and the Court of Appeal.
  • Costs of the proceedings in this court shall be taxed or agreed between the parties as soon as practically possible.