[2018] KEELC 4355 (KLR)

[2018] KEELC 4355 (KLR)

The court found that since the plaintiffs had withdrawn the suit, there was no longer any issue regarding dismissal for want of prosecution. Regarding the company instruments, the court relied on the official records from the Registrar of Companies, which listed the 1st, 3rd, and 6th plaintiffs as directors. The 1st...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELC 4355 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Simon Kandie & 6 Others; Defendant: Richardson Kipkoech Bundotich & 5 Others; Defendant: 4th Defendant; Defendant: 5th Defendant
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nakuru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 532 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Land and Property Suit / Ruling on Application for Dismissal and Release of Company Instruments
Outcome
Application for dismissal of suit overtaken by withdrawal; company instruments to be released to recognized directors.
Legal Topics
Company Instruments, Withdrawal of Suit, Directorship Dispute
Source Language
en
Land and Property Company Instruments Withdrawal of Suit Directorship Dispute

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Simon Kandie & 6 Others

Plaintiff

Richardson Kipkoech Bundotich & 5 Others

Defendant

4th Defendant

Defendant

5th Defendant

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Land and Property Suit / Ruling on Application for Dismissal and Release of Company Instruments

  1. 1 Whether the suit should be dismissed for want of prosecution after withdrawal by the plaintiffs.
  2. 2 Whether company instruments deposited in court should be released and to whom.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that since the plaintiffs had withdrawn the suit, there was no longer any issue regarding dismissal for want of prosecution. Regarding the company instruments, the court relied on the official records from the Registrar of Companies, which listed the 1st, 3rd, and 6th plaintiffs as directors. The 1st and 2nd defendants failed to provide evidence of their status as company officials. The court therefore ordered that the company instruments be released jointly to the 1st, 3rd, and 6th plaintiffs, as they were the recognized directors according to the Registrar's letter.

Court Disposition

Application for dismissal of suit overtaken by withdrawal; company instruments to be released to recognized directors.

Orders

  • The company instruments deposited in court shall be released jointly to the 1st, 3rd, and 6th plaintiffs.