[2018] KEHC 3469 (KLR)
The court found that although the appellant was convicted of an offence carrying a maximum sentence of 7 years, the 6-year sentence imposed was excessive given his guilty plea and first offender status. The court considered the mitigating factors, including the appellant's remorse and skills acquired in prison, and...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEHC 3469 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Simon Kibe Wanjiru; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nyahururu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 214 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal on sentence allowed; sentence reduced to time served and appellant placed on Community Service Order, subject to probation officer's assessment.
- Judges
- RPV Wendoh
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing Principles, Plea of Guilty, First Offender, Review of Sentence
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Simon Kibe Wanjiru
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence of 6 years imprisonment imposed on a first offender who pleaded guilty was excessive in the circumstances.
- 2 Whether the appellant should be considered for a non-custodial sentence or a reduced sentence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that although the appellant was convicted of an offence carrying a maximum sentence of 7 years, the 6-year sentence imposed was excessive given his guilty plea and first offender status. The court considered the mitigating factors, including the appellant's remorse and skills acquired in prison, and determined that a sentence equivalent to time already served, coupled with a Community Service Order, was more appropriate in the circumstances.
Court Disposition
Appeal on sentence allowed; sentence reduced to time served and appellant placed on Community Service Order, subject to probation officer's assessment.
Orders
- The appeal on sentence is allowed.
- The appellant's sentence is reduced to the period already served.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
25 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NYAHURURU
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 214 OF 2017
(Appeal Originating from Nyahururu CM’s Court Cr.No.1205 of 2017 by: Hon. O. Momanyi – S.R.M.)
SIMON KIBE WANJIRU..............APPELLANT
- V E R S U S –
REPUBLIC..................................RESPONDENT
J U D G M E N T
Simon Kibe Wanjiru was convicted for the offence of Breaking into a shop and stealing Contrary to Section 306 (a) and 279 (6) of the Penal Code.
The particulars of the charge are that on the night of 12/7/2017 at unknown time in Rurii Location, Olkalou Division in Nyandarua County,broke into an agro vet shop belonging to Jackson Njunge Ndungu and stole therein Kshs 250,000/=.
The appellant was arraigned before the court on 17/7/2017 and pleaded guilty to the charge. He was convicted on his own plea and sentenced to serve 6 years imprisonment.
He filed this appeal on 6/12/2017 challenging both conviction and sentence. However, when the appeal came up for hearing, he abandoned the appeal on conviction and proceeded with the appeal on sentence.
His ground of appeal are that he was a first offender, he pleaded guilty and therefore did not waste the court’s time; that the sentence is too harsh and requests for a review downwards to be considered for non custodial sentence or an affordable fine; that he has learnt skills in prison which will enable himself reliant.
The appeal on sentence was opposed. Learned counsel for the State Ms. Rugut argued that upon conviction, the offence for which the appellant was charged carries 7 years imprisonment, but he was only sentenced to 6 years imprisonment; that the court found the appellant to be un repentant and preferred a determent sentence.
I have considered the appeal and the opposition thereto. No doubt the appellant pleaded guilty and did not waste the court’s time into going to a full hearing. He was treated as a first offender. Although the court seems not to have believed him, the appellant asked for forgiveness. The appellant also claims to have learnt skills while in prison and is remorseful.
Under the provision in which the appellant was charged, upon conviction, one is liable to 7 years imprisonment. The appellant was given 6 years imprisonment which in my view was on the higher side considering the maximum sentence under the section to have been 7 years, for the above reason, I find the sentence to have been excessive in the circumstances.
So far, the appellant has served one year imprisonment. I hereby allow the appeal and sentence him to the year already served and will further place him on Community Service Order. I hereby call for Probation Officer to find out whether the appellant is suitable for Community Service Order.
Dated, SignedandDeliveredatNYAHURURUthis 25thday of July, 2018.
......................................
R.V.P WENDOH
JUDGE
PRESENT:-
Ms. Rugut - Prosecution Counsel
Soi - Court Assistant
Appellant in person