[1997] KECA 358 (KLR)

[1997] KECA 358 (KLR)

The court found that there was no legal impediment to granting leave to file a supplementary record of appeal under Rule 85(2A) of the Court of Appeal Rules. The omission of the order granting leave to appeal was due to oversight, as explained in the supporting affidavit. The court exercised its discretion under...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1997] KECA 358 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Simon Kitavo Nduto; Applicant: Jubilee Insurance Company; Respondent: Benson Owenga Anjere
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 170 of 1995
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Leave to File Supplementary Record of Appeal
Outcome
Application allowed. Leave granted to file supplementary record of appeal.
Legal Topics
Supplementary Record of Appeal, Leave to Appeal, Court of Appeal Rules
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Supplementary Record of Appeal Leave to Appeal Court of Appeal Rules

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Simon Kitavo Nduto

Applicant

Jubilee Insurance Company

Applicant

Benson Owenga Anjere

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Application for Leave to File Supplementary Record of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicants should be granted leave to file a supplementary record of appeal to include the order granting leave to appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the omission of the order from the record was an excusable oversight.
  3. 3 Whether granting leave would prejudice the respondent.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that there was no legal impediment to granting leave to file a supplementary record of appeal under Rule 85(2A) of the Court of Appeal Rules. The omission of the order granting leave to appeal was due to oversight, as explained in the supporting affidavit. The court exercised its discretion under Rule 42, noting that no prejudice would be caused to the respondent by allowing the application. Consequently, the court granted the leave sought, allowing the applicants to file and serve the supplementary record within 15 days.

Court Disposition

Application allowed. Leave granted to file supplementary record of appeal.

Orders

  • Leave is granted to the applicants to file and serve a supplementary record of appeal within 15 days from the date hereof.
  • No order as to costs.