[2020] KEHC 6885 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 6885 (KLR)

The court found no sufficient reason or exceptional circumstance to warrant interference with the sentence imposed by the trial court. Despite the ongoing COVID-19 crisis, the case did not present grounds justifying revision of the sentence. The sentence of one year imprisonment for the offences of threatening to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEHC 6885 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Simon Lemalaso; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nanyuki
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Revision 76 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Order on Revision
Outcome
application for revision dismissed
Legal Topics
Sentencing Revision, Threats to Kill, Malicious Damage to Property
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Sentencing Revision Threats to Kill Malicious Damage to Property

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Simon Lemalaso

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Revision / Order on Revision

  1. 1 Whether the sentence imposed by the trial court should be revised in light of the circumstances, including the COVID-19 crisis.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found no sufficient reason or exceptional circumstance to warrant interference with the sentence imposed by the trial court. Despite the ongoing COVID-19 crisis, the case did not present grounds justifying revision of the sentence. The sentence of one year imprisonment for the offences of threatening to kill and malicious damage to property was deemed appropriate and lawful. The court therefore dismissed the application for revision and upheld the original sentence.

Court Disposition

application for revision dismissed

Orders

  • The request for revision is dismissed.
  • The original sentence imposed by the trial court is upheld.