[2019] KEELRC 1506 (KLR)
The court found that the issue of whether the claimant was suspended from employment was highly contested and not supported by clear evidence, as the claimant had been granted ten days off duty to attend a burial and there was no suspension letter produced. The court held that it would be inappropriate to grant the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEELRC 1506 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Simon Lianda Makheti; Respondent: Wells Fargo Limited
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause 1236 of 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application / Ruling on Interim Relief Pending Hearing
- Outcome
- application dismissed with costs
- Judges
- DI Wasike
- Legal Topics
- Suspension Without Pay, Interim Relief, Employee Dismissal, Burden of Proof
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Simon Lianda Makheti
Applicant
Wells Fargo Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Ruling on Interim Relief Pending Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant was suspended from employment pending the outcome of a criminal case.
- 2 Whether the claimant is entitled to interim payment of salary pending determination of the claim.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the issue of whether the claimant was suspended from employment was highly contested and not supported by clear evidence, as the claimant had been granted ten days off duty to attend a burial and there was no suspension letter produced. The court held that it would be inappropriate to grant the interim order for payment of salary in the absence of clear proof of suspension, and that the application lacked merit. The application was therefore dismissed with costs to the respondent.
Court Disposition
application dismissed with costs
Orders
- The claimant's application for interim payment of salary is dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
26 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT OF
KENYA AT NAIROBI
CAUSE NUMBER 1236 OF 2015
SIMON LIANDA MAKHETI...........CLAIMANT/RESPONDENT
VERSUS
WELLS FARGO LIMITED....................................RESPONDENT
RULING
1. By a motion dated 1st July, 2015 the claimant sought orders among others that the respondent be directed to pay the claimant Kshs 12,000/= per month with effect from 1st April, 2015 pending the hearing and determination of the claim.
2. The application was brought on the grounds that the claimant took plea at Milimani Court pursuant thereto placed on suspension without pay to await the outcome of the case and that the claimant does not have any other source of income to sustain him and his immediate family members.
3. The respondent opposed the application and filed a replying affidavit through one Willis Ayieko Onyango who stated that he was the human resource director of the respondent. The respondent admitted that the claimant was on the 9th April, arrested on suspension of theft at a Bank where the claimant was posted as a security guard. The respondent however denied the claimant was suspended on 24th April, 2015 as no suspension letter was exhibited by the claimant in support of the averment.
4. According to Mr Onyango, the respondent had well set down procedures for suspension which included issuing suspension letter o an employee on suspension. Further the respondent had its own internal disciplinary mechanisms and does not depend on the outcome of criminal proceedings in making decision on employer misconduct. According to Mr Onyango the claimant annexed an off duty leave pass granting him 10 days off starting from 27th April, 2015 to 9th May 2015 for purposes of attending a burial.
5. It was therefore not probable that the claimant was suspended for the period of the criminal case since according to the off duty pass he was required to return to work on 9th May, 2015 without fail. Mr Onyango further deponed that the claimant deserted duty and this was evidence by a letter from his advocate dated 28th April, 2015 issued a day after the claimant was granted 10 days leave to attend a funeral. According to the respondent the claimant never returned to work at the end of his leave on 9th May, 2015 and was therefore treated as a deserter.
6. The question whether the claimant was suspended from work is hotly contested by the respondent on credible grounds. The claimant attached to his memorandum of claim an off duty pass dated 27th April, 2015 granting him ten days off duty to attend a burial. He was required to resume work on 10th May, 2015. On 28th April, 2015 the next day after he was granted ten days off-duty, his advocate issued a demand note alleging the respondent had suspended the claimant pending the outcome of the criminal case the claimant was facing and that the respondent do pay the claimant his half salary in default of which the respondent would face legal action.
7. It is curious as the respondent observed, that the claimant would claim he was suspended from duty only a day after he had been granted off duty for ten days to attend a burial. If it is true as alleged that the claimant was on suspension pending the outcome of the criminal case, there was no need for him to seek permission for ten days to attend a burial.
8. The issue therefore of whether the claimant was on suspension and therefore amounted to a dismissal thus giving rise to the present claim is hotly contested. It would therefore not be appropriate to grant the order sought in the application herein. The same is therefore found without merit and is hereby dismissed with costs.
9. It is so ordered.
Dated at Nairobi this 17th day of May 2019
Abuodha J. N.
Judge
Delivered this 17th day of May 2019
Abuodha J. N.
Judge
In the presence of:-
…………………………………………………………for the Claimant and
……………………………………………………………for the Respondent.