[2015] KEHC 3300 (KLR)

[2015] KEHC 3300 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiff/applicant had established a prima facie case as the registered owner of the suit land, and that the defendant/respondent had not opposed the application or provided any justification for their actions. The applicant demonstrated a risk of loss and damage if the orders were not...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] KEHC 3300 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Simon M Ekuruka; Respondent: Gatura Marigu Gacwe
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 34 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Injunction and Inhibition Application
Outcome
Application allowed. Temporary injunction and inhibition orders granted as prayed. Costs in the cause.
Legal Topics
Interlocutory Injunctions, Land Title Disputes, Registration of Land, Possession and Occupation
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Interlocutory Injunctions Land Title Disputes Registration of Land Possession and Occupation

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Simon M Ekuruka

Applicant

Gatura Marigu Gacwe

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Injunction and Inhibition Application

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff/applicant is entitled to a temporary injunction restraining the defendant/respondent from interfering with land parcel No. THARAKA/NKONDI “A”/1196 pending determination of the suit.
  2. 2 Whether an order of inhibition should be issued to prevent registration of any transactions over the suit land pending determination of the suit.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff/applicant had established a prima facie case as the registered owner of the suit land, and that the defendant/respondent had not opposed the application or provided any justification for their actions. The applicant demonstrated a risk of loss and damage if the orders were not granted. In the absence of opposition and given the circumstances, the court granted the orders of temporary injunction and inhibition to preserve the subject matter of the suit pending its determination. Costs were ordered to be in the cause.

Court Disposition

Application allowed. Temporary injunction and inhibition orders granted as prayed. Costs in the cause.

Orders

  • A temporary order of injunction is issued restraining the defendant/respondent, her agents, servants, employees, or anyone acting on her behalf from cultivating, occupying, moving into, alienating, disposing, charging, transferring, constructing, or in any other manner dealing with or interfering with the...
  • An order of inhibition is issued inhibiting the registration of any entries, dispositions, or transactions over land parcel No. THARAKA/NKONDI “A”/1196 pending the hearing and determination of the suit.