[2018] KEELC 2653 (KLR)

[2018] KEELC 2653 (KLR)

The court held that after delivering its judgment on 27th April, 2016, it became functus officio in the matter and thus lacked jurisdiction to entertain the application for leave to cease acting filed by the defendant's advocates. The application did not fall within the category of post-judgment applications that...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELC 2653 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Simon Muchiri Wanjohi; Defendant: Benson Kabugi Muriuki
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nyeri
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 24 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Post Judgment; Application for Leave to Cease Acting
Outcome
Application dismissed for want of jurisdiction; court functus officio.
Judges
L Waithaka
Legal Topics
Leave to Cease Acting, Post Judgment Applications, Functus Officio, Service of Process
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Leave to Cease Acting Post Judgment Applications Functus Officio Service of Process

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Simon Muchiri Wanjohi

Plaintiff

Benson Kabugi Muriuki

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Post Judgment; Application for Leave to Cease Acting

  1. 1 Whether the court has jurisdiction to entertain an application for leave to cease acting after judgment has been delivered and the court is functus officio.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant has demonstrated sufficient grounds to be granted leave to cease acting for the defendant.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that after delivering its judgment on 27th April, 2016, it became functus officio in the matter and thus lacked jurisdiction to entertain the application for leave to cease acting filed by the defendant's advocates. The application did not fall within the category of post-judgment applications that the court is permitted to consider, such as those relating to execution or matters affected by the judgment or decree. As a result, the court declined to grant the orders sought and dismissed the application.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed for want of jurisdiction; court functus officio.

Orders

  • The application dated 24th August, 2017 is dismissed.