[2013] KEELRC 430 (KLR)

[2013] KEELRC 430 (KLR)

The court found that all substantive prayers in the Notice of Motion, including enlargement of time to file the Notice of Appeal and stay of execution, had already been granted ex parte by Hon. Justice Nduma on 8th January 2013. As such, the court could not make any further orders on the application without...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2013] KEELRC 430 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Simon Mungata; Claimant: Patrick Abwova; Claimant: Paul Juma; Claimant: Francis Ndanyi Musera; Claimant: Christopher Muchera Ilahalwa; Claimant: Stephen Mukabana; Claimant: Augustine Ndambuki; Claimant: Patrick Sabwa; Respondent: Parbat Siyan Construction Ltd
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 1291 of 2012
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution and Enlargement of Time to File Notice of Appeal
Outcome
Application referred back to original judge for further directions; no further orders granted.
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Enlargement of Time, Notice of Appeal, Judgment Delivery, Procedural Fairness
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Stay of Execution Enlargement of Time Notice of Appeal Judgment Delivery Procedural Fairness

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Simon Mungata

Claimant

Patrick Abwova

Claimant

Paul Juma

Claimant

Francis Ndanyi Musera

Claimant

Christopher Muchera Ilahalwa

Claimant

Stephen Mukabana

Claimant

Augustine Ndambuki

Claimant

Patrick Sabwa

Claimant

Parbat Siyan Construction Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution and Enlargement of Time to File Notice of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the court should enlarge time for filing the Notice of Appeal after judgment was delivered without notice to the respondent.
  2. 2 Whether a stay of execution of the judgment should be granted pending appeal.
  3. 3 Whether the court can make further orders where all substantive prayers have already been granted ex parte.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that all substantive prayers in the Notice of Motion, including enlargement of time to file the Notice of Appeal and stay of execution, had already been granted ex parte by Hon. Justice Nduma on 8th January 2013. As such, the court could not make any further orders on the application without constituting a review of the orders already granted. The proper course was to refer the file back to the judge who issued the original orders for further directions. The court thus declined to make any further orders and referred the matter back to Hon. Justice Nduma.

Court Disposition

Application referred back to original judge for further directions; no further orders granted.

Orders

  • The file is referred back to Hon. Mr. Justice Nduma for further directions.